<HTML>Deano wrote:
>
> Science "appears" to highlight similarities between fossils
> while supressing the differences [just an impression?] and
> form theories of what the "missing frames" might contain.
****Now can you give me a couple of examples of this "suppresion" you talk about Deano?? Any books or people burning that you can report??
Any visits by Inquisition???
> These missing frames are the so-called "gaps" in evolution.
> Within the last 10/20 years, science has "evolved" to finding
> more than one single frame on the same subject, with fewer
> missing frames; DNA/Gnome studies. The results of this very
> young scientific tool are inconsistent/incongruent with human
> evolution theories. There are "missing frames" which would
> explain the 223 enigmatic human genes.
****Even IF those 223 genes were enigmatic that's peanuts comparing to the overall number of genes in human genome, and there are millions more of "enigmatic" genes there. As you have said yourself it is a "very
young scientific tool" give it a chance to grow a bit and you might get your answers.
>
> Appearently, "Professional Scientific Speculation" is all we
> have, today. Yet, in spite of all we have, we still don't
> "know". We know very little about "what" happened, prehaps a
> little more about "when" but absolutely nothing about "why or
> how".
****So??? Science (at least "good science")unlike religion does not pretent that it has answers to all possible questions, nor does it pretent that it is infallible. And do you seriously expect or demand quick and convincing SCIENTIFIC answers to something which happened milions of years ago and was an unique process quite impossible (yet) to recreate or emulate???
Regards D.P.</HTML>
