On the contrary from the article..."The earliest artifacts unearthed at Cooper's Ferry are stone projectile heads with stems that differ significantly from those of the Clovis prehistoric culture once thought the first inhabitants of the Americas. Clovis stone points have distinct fluted channels at their bases that the Cooper's Ferry points lack. According to Davis and his colleagues, the points they found closely resembled artifacts from northeastern Asia, particularly Japan. They are now collaborating with Japanese researchers to conduct further comparisons of artifacts from Japan, Russia and Cooper's Ferry." Interesting that they never consider the possibility that an unrelated group of people could have arrived from Japan, or somewhere in that vicinity, landed in the Americas, prospered for awhile and then vanished leaving only their stone tools behind. Tracing the link to the Science article I found no mention of human remains being found at Cooper's Creek so as usual they try to shove the square peg of stone tools into the round hole of DNA and wondering why we don't get a match.

As usual the orthodox keeps trying to dismiss independent migrations of seafaring hominids the Americas from Japan and Australasia, and prefer the typical landlubber approach that the only way to get from point A to point B is to walk. If you run into water "Stop". As a result, we keep creating imaginary land migration routes, rather than considering the inescapable fact that earlier hominids (Homo flo. Homo erectus, among others) [www.nationalgeographic.com] figured out how to get across the ocean in one piece survive for centuries or even millennia before going extinct. The fact that there are DNA signatures of austrlaoindonesian genes in these skeletons is papered over with more conjectures of collateral groups of people merging with the main groups in one of these migrations, rather than considering the fact that another group arrived from Australia first. What did KK use to say about the superiority, and arrogance of Homo sap. in relation to previous hominids? The reason was because it was something along the line of "We're God's little snowflake".



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 05/08/2020 01:13PM by Rick Baudé.