This was last discussed I think at [www.hallofmaat.com]. I've just seen a report on this which you can read at [www.sciencedirect.com] "The Cinmar discovery and the proposed pre-Late Glacial Maximum occupation of North America" byMetin I. Erena, b, , , Matthew T. Boulangera, c, , , Michael J. O'Briena, The paper concludes;

"Until clearly and reliably addressed, the gravity of the discrepancies and factual inaccuracies presented above indicates that there is no evidence that the stone blade and the mastodon remains were associated or where exactly either was originally discovered. Going further, given the reported inconsistencies in the blade's history, there is no confirmable evidence currently available that demonstrates that it was even dredged up by the Cinmar. Thus, even in the event that the same, original underwater mastodon site is eventually empirically proven to be re-located at some point in the future, this re-discovery would not provide context for, or validate, the stone blade's association with it."

Doug Weller

Doug Weller

Director The Hall of Ma'at
Doug's Skeptical Archaeology site::
[www.ramtops.co.uk]