1. I don't have to prove anything. I posted an anomaly. It exists. Because of what it suggests (the bowl) it would seem to be of interest. obviously that is not the case. As I said there are Sumerian experts n this forum. I'm more than willing to hear their insight. Gibberish or the real deal.
2. Your comment about the possible pharaoh image is really out there. You mean to say if an image is NOT more than flashed it is a fake? What is the valid time for an image? I did point out that you could view the image and stop it to look as long as you like. I even offered the 2 bucks if you didn't want o spring for it. it looks to me like all of these offered objects in the video are to REAL to want anybody noting them. And as I keep saying CONTEXT or lack of has NOTHING to do with the validity of the object.
3. I totally agree that the video is rampant with NEW contextual claims. None of them provable. That being said the objects in question exist unto themselves. They suggest certain new contexts yet to be developed. The OLD contexts do NOT explain them in the least. Time for some new analysis.