Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 6, 2024, 4:59 am UTC    
Claire
August 27, 2001 04:53PM
<HTML>Kat

That post would have made more sense if I had included the relevant reference from Schoch right? ~lol~ [14] goes to

"14] Gauri and his colleagues (see, for instance, Punuru et al, 1990, 230) consistently refer to these in such terms as "Pharaonic veneer stones" that have experienced "5,000 years of exposure to local conditions," that is, they were applied during Old Kingdom times. Recently Egyptian Egyptologist Zahi Hawass (Abstracts for The First International Symposium on the Great Sphinx-Towards Global Treatment of the Sphinx, Cairo 29 February-3 March 1992 [Egyptian Antiquities Organization, Cairo, 1992], 14) stated: "It seems that the Sphinx underwent restoration during the Old Kingdom because the analysis of samples found on the right rear leg proved to be of Old Kingdom date." [back]"

So Hawass says that the Sphinx underwent restoration during the OK because the analysis of samples found on the right rear leg proved to be of Old Kingdom date.

Where on his website is this? Can you help me?

Claire</HTML>
Subject Author Posted

Conjecture and the nature of science

Garrett Fagan August 27, 2001 11:11AM

Re: Conjecture and the nature of science

Claire August 27, 2001 12:25PM

Re: Conjecture and the nature of science

Garrett Fagan August 27, 2001 02:17PM

Re: Conjecture from me

Claire August 27, 2001 03:31PM

Re: Conjecture from me

Katherine Reece August 27, 2001 03:58PM

Re: Conjecture from me

Claire August 27, 2001 04:44PM

Oops

Claire August 27, 2001 04:53PM

Re: Conjecture from me

Katherine Reece August 27, 2001 05:44PM

Re: Conjecture from me

Claire August 28, 2001 01:58AM

Re: Conjecture from me

Katherine Reece August 28, 2001 07:47AM

Re: Conjecture from me

Mikey Brass August 27, 2001 06:45PM

Re: Conjecture from me

Garrett August 27, 2001 07:57PM

Re: Conjecture from me

Claire August 27, 2001 03:31PM

Re: Conjecture and the nature of science

Garrett Fagan August 27, 2001 02:17PM

Re: Conjecture and the nature of science

R. Avry Wilson August 27, 2001 02:06PM

Re: Conjecture and the nature of science

Garrett Fagan August 27, 2001 02:22PM

Re: Conjecture and the nature of science

Mikey Brass August 27, 2001 02:37PM

Apologies

Garrett Fagan August 27, 2001 02:43PM

Re: Apologies

Bryan August 28, 2001 04:43AM

Re: Conjecture and the nature of science

Mark Fagan August 28, 2001 06:10AM

Re: Conjecture and the nature of science

ISHMAEL August 28, 2001 06:54AM

Re: Conjecture and the nature of science

Mikey Brass August 28, 2001 10:20AM

Re: Conjecture and the nature of science

Anonymous User August 28, 2001 07:23AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login