Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 20, 2024, 9:25 am UTC    
November 16, 2011 01:58PM
Well it could be a forgery.

However the dotted R and the hooked X were not generally known in the 19th century. Also the 'Easter count' used by Cistercian monks to authenticate the date would seem to contribute to authenticy. Either Olf Ohman had extensive knowledge of obscure medieval runes to create the forgery or the engraving is authentic.

"The Stone Age did not end for lack of stone, and the Oil Age will end long before the world runs out of oil"

-- Sheikh Zaki Yamani
Subject Author Posted

kensington runestone

bernard November 16, 2011 11:20AM

Re: kensington runestone

Doug Weller November 16, 2011 11:41AM

Re: kensington runestone

Hermione November 16, 2011 11:50AM

Re: kensington runestone

Allan Shumaker November 16, 2011 01:58PM

Re: kensington runestone

Roxana Cooper November 17, 2011 10:46AM

Re: kensington runestone

Lee Olsen November 17, 2011 12:48PM

Re: kensington runestone

Roxana Cooper November 17, 2011 06:28PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login