<HTML>I meant that, the size reduction being the source for the apparent offset is not fatal to the OCT.
It's a question of how an offset is achieved: either by moving a structure or reducing its size (and thus repositioning it's pinacle <i>and</i> its attached mortuary temple). Either way, an offset does exist for both the pinnicle and the mortuary temple.
The problem is that the position, being exact in terms of its south east corner, and in that space remains for a larger construct, leaves it rather ambiguous (I agree) as to whether or not these offsets were intentional.
All I can hope for is a correlation of sufficient accuracy to eliminate the element of chance. Without that - I really don't have a leg to stand on with this thing. It's just one big conjecture.
ISHMAEL</HTML>
