| April 30, 2024, 4:02 pm UTC |
 |
| In: The Hall of Maat > Ancient History - Ancient History and Archaeology > Topic |
| Goto: Forum List • Create A New Profile • Log In |
|
Ancient History •
Ancient Egypt •
Laboratory •
Humanities •
Apocalypse •
Paper Lens •
Coffee Shop Exhibitions, Conferences, Lectures, Journals • Alternative Geometry and Numerology |
| August 16, 2001 11:05PM |
<HTML>D.Przezdziecki wrote:
[...]
> So Big Bang looks like a good bet for me.
Whilst the Big Bang theory is the one that best fits the observed phenomena, it is certainly not without problems. For a readable introduction to BB, may I suggest John Gribbin's <i>In Search of the Big Bang</i>. Also very interesting, especially in relation to questions surrounding time, is Paul Davies' <i>About Time</>. Both are inevitably dated – but this is inevitable as new findings occur at least weekly.
With respect to Don's question, I think that BB is probably fairly close (and I say this as one who, as a Hoyle/Steady State fan since childhood, long resisted B
. Now, if someone could just explain the apparent quantization of red-shifts I'd be a lot happier with it...</HTML>
[...]
> So Big Bang looks like a good bet for me.
Whilst the Big Bang theory is the one that best fits the observed phenomena, it is certainly not without problems. For a readable introduction to BB, may I suggest John Gribbin's <i>In Search of the Big Bang</i>. Also very interesting, especially in relation to questions surrounding time, is Paul Davies' <i>About Time</>. Both are inevitably dated – but this is inevitable as new findings occur at least weekly.
With respect to Don's question, I think that BB is probably fairly close (and I say this as one who, as a Hoyle/Steady State fan since childhood, long resisted B
. Now, if someone could just explain the apparent quantization of red-shifts I'd be a lot happier with it...</HTML>
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.