Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 11, 2024, 6:13 pm UTC    
July 25, 2001 09:51AM
<HTML>John
There are a lot of people that would argue against what I say about obliquity change. But reguardless of any arguments against me, the fact remains that since the time of the pyramids, the obliquity of this planet has altered significantly. Along side that is minute but significant changes in the precessional period. A reduced obliquity means a reduced precession. Even if we were to work on the 14.4 meters per year(0.45 arc second per year) rate of change for the last 4,500 year period. The precessional cycle would not have remained at a constant 71.6 years per 1° of precessional movement. The figure would have been longer by a matter of days, weeks or months. Do astronomers take this into consideration when calculating precessional movement and stellar positions for past time periods?</HTML>
Subject Author Posted

Unfortunately

sandy July 25, 2001 08:28AM

Re: Unfortunately

John Wall July 25, 2001 08:31AM

Re: Unfortunately

sandy July 25, 2001 08:37AM

Re: Unfortunately

John Wall July 25, 2001 08:39AM

Re: Unfortunately

Anthony July 25, 2001 09:07AM

Re: Unfortunately

John Wall July 25, 2001 09:09AM

Re: Unfortunately

sandy July 25, 2001 09:51AM

Re: Unfortunately

John Wall July 25, 2001 10:23AM

Re: Unfortunately

Mikey Brass July 25, 2001 12:10PM

Re: Unfortunately

John Wall July 25, 2001 04:43PM

Re: Unfortunately

Mikey Brass July 25, 2001 04:58PM

Re: Unfortunately

John Wall July 25, 2001 05:08PM

Re: Unfortunately

javier July 25, 2001 05:53PM

Re: Unfortunately

John Wall July 25, 2001 06:21PM

Sandy...

Anthony July 25, 2001 05:02PM

Re: Sandy...

sandy July 26, 2001 11:45AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login