Johnee Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It happens to be a very neat coincidence that I am
> prepared to accept.

What coincidence?

> One either does or one doesn’t and all and
> everything is questioned.

What does this statement mean?
>
> But it is interesting no less that a dating
> clerically accepted for three hundred years
> coincides with a dating scientifically accepted
> today.

It might cause a moment's fleeting amusement, but nothing more. Ussher's dating has not been "accepted for three hundred years" (you might find this article of interest).
>
> The pyramids were built immediately prior to the
> Deluge.
>
> Now that has got to be significant.

A local flood in Southern Babylon might - or might not - have taken place in c. 2800 BC. Some while later, developments in AE culture, religion and civil engineering resulted in the appearance of various funerary monuments. How on earth are these two sets of events (one of which is anyway in doubt) at two sites some 800 miles apart supposed to be connected or significant in any way whatsoever?

Hermione
Director/Moderator - The Hall of Ma'at

Rules and Guidelines

hallofmaatforum@proton.me