Graham Chase Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Whatever you think of the exercise, any attempt to
> explain a geometry must take into consideration
> the three alignment bases. To assume an average
> one as so many have done in the past will not give
> a proper result.
> So whether you call it special pleading or not,
> does not get round this fact.
>
> It IS part of being accurate.
> A lot of progress in the understanding of this has
> been made recently.

You might find this link of interest:

[www.xenu.net]

This one is, I think, of particular relevance in this discussion:

"Spin more than one hypothesis - don't simply run with the first idea that caught your fancy."

At Giza there are, as you admit, "three alignment bases"; i.e., each pyramid has a slightly different alignment.

Another point that should also be borne in mind is that, at Giza, there are several different values of the cubit:

[www.ronaldbirdsall.com]

If there was a pre-determined plan, surely it would equally have demanded a cubit of pre-determined measure? So might it be worth considering an alternative hypothesis, namely, that there is no pre-determined plan at Giza?

Hermione
Director/Moderator - The Hall of Ma'at

Rules and Guidelines

hallofmaatforum@proton.me