Graham Chase Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> If the facts now proven about the geometry are
> still disputed then it is time to sort that out
> now, because these facts could not be accidental
> and we are looking for intentionality.


There are no 'proven facts'. A proven fact could e.g. be a wall in Khufu's pyramid on which we discovered remnants of an incised (or so) 'Giza overall-ground plan', on which we could BASE ourselves to RECONSTRUCT this ground-plan, according to DATA GENERATED and left behind BY THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS. The 'groundplan' we 'have' now is an INVENTED one, not a reconstructed one. Archaeology is all about RECONSTRUCTION of the past by means of GENUINE ARTEFACTS. You don't respect this basic rule, that's why you only are an alternate.

It's utterly nonsense that Khufu should have cared about the tombs of his successors. Assumed that he should have cared, why only two pyramids and not, let's say, five ? six ? Plenty of successors and abundant room on the Giza-plateau, isn't it ?


Ronald.