creigs1707 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hermione: Like many other AE scholars, John Wall
> rejects the concept of any pre-planned site design
> at Giza,
>
> SC: Simply because there are 'many' does not mean
> they must be right. There were many Geologists
> who told J. Harlen Brentz that he was wrong and
> that they were right. His theory did not fit the
> 'accepted model'. But we now know he WAS right.
But, by the same token, and in your own phrase, the mere fact of being told that one is wrong does not automatically mean that one is right. They laughed at Einstein, they laughed at Darwin, but they also laughed at Bobo the Clown ...
> SC: It is my opinion that the 'weight of evidence'
> is now moving firmly in the direction of a
> pre-planned design at Giza.
It is my opinion that the weight of evidence points to a completely different conclusion.
The OCT/GOCT cannot
> simply be dismissed out of hand simply because it
> dares to challenge the 'accepted view'.
But the mere fact of challenging the accepted view doesn't form a strong argument for accepting it, either!
> That John
> Wall disagrees that such pre-plans existed is, of
> course, his perogative but like the Geological
> Society of North America that J. Harlen Brentz
> successfully challenged, I too believe that J.
> Wall too will also find that he is wrong.
Somehow, I rather doubt this ...
Hermione
Director/Moderator - The Hall of Ma'at
Rules and Guidelines
hallofmaatforum@proton.me
