I was mainly curious because it was an excellent and interesting set of pages and LOOKED like the person who did it actually knew what they were talking about. It wasn't a name I recognized, though. So, before I bookmarked it as "good source to use in debate" I thought I'd come ask folks who had more of a clue than I did if the translations could be considered correct or were off in the "little green men painted all the pretty pictures" group.

You know how annoying scholars are. We always want to know about the source.

I think I'm satisfied now that I can add it to my Debate section.