Roxana Cooper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Maybe I missed a verse or two but I don't think
> the pyramids are in the Bible at all.
It's not only that they indeed were not in the Bible at all.
The article says this ;
'Research conducted by Mr Sweeney, a University of Ulster graduate from Malborough Street, found a number of similarities between Old Testament Biblical writings and those unearthed in Egypt, which were traditionally thought to have been much older.'
The Bible is not a reliable source, it's a phantasy (in my eyes).
And this ;
'The work to construct the Pyramids is very advanced. They are made of granite, which can only be carved with steel.'
Since when are the pyramids made of granite ? I thought the major constructing material was limestone (at least for the Giza-pyramids) ? Hasn't granite only been used for the portcullis doors and relieving chambers ?
This book indicates again how tempting a subject pyramids are to make believe people no matter what. First, we had theories/books on pyramids being much older than they really are, now we have theories/books claiming that the pyramids are much younger than they really are... As long as it is spectacular (just look at the joke in Visoko), no need for the scientific evidence anymore ...