<HTML>Not quite, barry. It's about method and procedure. Period. GH and RB and their ilk not only eschew they deny historical method and procedure, they are now trying to dodge the evidence bullet entirely. "History" without evidence is no history -- it's mythology.
We are talking the realm of ideas here, rendering your Word Bank analogy irrelevant. I know plenty of archaeologists/scientists/historians/philosophers/ etc who've done nothing whatsoever with regard to the World Bank or even the IMF. Does this render their ideas meaningless?
GF</HTML>