Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 15, 2024, 11:01 am UTC    
September 11, 2006 09:48AM
Goldcalf Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> As far as anyone knows, the Great Pyramid is far
> more advanced than any of the others and may have
> no connection with any of them whatsoever.

Explain "advanced" and why it's "advanced" compared to the monumental statues and complex temple designs. Is it 'advanced' because the Pyramidiots told you so and forgot to show you the other structures? Is it 'advanced' because you have been led to believe that the Egyptians of the time couldn't build anything beyond a mud hut?

Explain why it (and its slightly misaligned proportions) is "advanced", please. I'd think that something engineered to within a few inches of true (like the temples) would be far more advanced than the GP, which is out of proportion by more than 10 feet per side.

> I don't
> have to address the design of any of them. Those
> are just ordinary pyramids to me, hardly worth
> bothering about.

You're on the wrong track there. The Pyramidiots would have you examine only the one pyramid, as if it suddenly landed in Egypt without history or provenance. In fact there are over 100 pyramids in Egypt and they're very interesting structures.


> to address, which I have just done by producing
> what is the most accurate derivation procedure for
> the Pyramid's height/width

You haven't demonstrated that. Or shown that it was actually used that way.

> and also a plausible
> explanation for the positioning of the "air
> shafts" and King's and Queen's Chambers, being
> based on both hexagonal geometry and the double
> falcon pictograph which depicts "a lifetime of a
> million years", exactly what the Pharaohs sought
> to attain after physical death.

Sorry, but you haven't shown that. You've just retrofitted a design to another design. This is not evidence of anything. You took two artifacts and a symbol and said "voila!"

I can retrofit the design of my cat's ear to your drawings, but that doesn't mean that she's either a genius about pyramids or is carrying around the secrets of cheops in that fuzzy skull.

> been one of my most rewarding "projects". Too bad
> the majority of people on this forum choose not to
> share my joy of discovery.

It's too bad that you haven't shared our joy of learning about the other pyramids and the other temples and the culture and society of the time. Speculating about ancient cultures without knowing about their art, math, society, and other structures is simply... well.. mental self-gratification.

Subject Author Posted

New GP hexagram theory

Goldcalf September 09, 2006 07:27PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Goldcalf September 09, 2006 07:38PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

MJ Thomas September 10, 2006 04:31AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Goldcalf September 10, 2006 11:23AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Warwick L Nixon September 10, 2006 11:36AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

JQ Jacobs September 10, 2006 12:54PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Warwick L Nixon September 10, 2006 01:00PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Katherine Reece September 10, 2006 01:21PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Dave L September 09, 2006 07:40PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Steve LeMaster September 09, 2006 08:28PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Goldcalf September 09, 2006 10:17PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Katherine Reece September 09, 2006 11:11PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Steve LeMaster September 09, 2006 11:18PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Greg Reeder September 09, 2006 11:27PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Steve LeMaster September 09, 2006 11:38PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Doug Weller September 10, 2006 12:05AM

You are correct

Steve LeMaster September 10, 2006 12:10AM

Re: You are correct

Greg Reeder September 10, 2006 12:19AM

Re: You are correct

Steve LeMaster September 10, 2006 12:24AM

Re: You are correct

Greg Reeder September 10, 2006 12:29AM

Re: You are correct

Doug Weller September 10, 2006 07:53AM

Re: You are correct

Warwick L Nixon September 10, 2006 09:18AM

Re: You are correct

Greg Reeder September 10, 2006 09:21AM

Re: You are correct

MJ Thomas September 10, 2006 10:20AM

Re: You are correct

Litz September 10, 2006 01:10PM

Re: You are correct

Doug Weller September 10, 2006 01:21PM

Re: You are correct

Steve LeMaster September 10, 2006 01:45PM

Re: You are correct

Greg Reeder September 10, 2006 01:52PM

Re: You are correct

Doug Weller September 10, 2006 02:02PM

Re: You are correct

Greg Reeder September 10, 2006 04:46PM

Re: You are correct

John Wall September 10, 2006 04:48PM

Re: You are correct

Greg Reeder September 10, 2006 04:56PM

Re: You are correct

John Wall September 10, 2006 04:58PM

Congratulations!

Katherine Reece September 10, 2006 05:22PM

Re: Congratulations!

Greg Reeder September 10, 2006 05:43PM

Re: Congratulations!

Katherine Reece September 10, 2006 05:52PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

MJ Thomas September 10, 2006 04:22AM

that's..

Warwick L Nixon September 10, 2006 09:09AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Katherine Reece September 10, 2006 01:08AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Goldcalf September 10, 2006 09:07AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Warwick L Nixon September 10, 2006 09:25AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Goldcalf September 10, 2006 11:18AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Katherine Reece September 10, 2006 11:25AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Goldcalf September 10, 2006 01:22PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Katherine Reece September 10, 2006 01:26PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Warwick L Nixon September 10, 2006 11:28AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Goldcalf September 10, 2006 02:17PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

John Wall September 10, 2006 02:21PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Warwick L Nixon September 10, 2006 02:56PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Goldcalf September 10, 2006 09:05AM

Yawn.. (NT)

Joe_S September 10, 2006 01:48AM

Re: Yawn.. (NT)

Goldcalf September 10, 2006 09:22AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Dave L September 10, 2006 03:19PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

John Wall September 10, 2006 04:07AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

MJ Thomas September 10, 2006 05:15AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

John Wall September 10, 2006 05:28AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

MJ Thomas September 10, 2006 05:46AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

goaten September 11, 2006 08:09PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Dave L September 10, 2006 03:14PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Katherine Reece September 10, 2006 03:21PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Dave L September 10, 2006 03:44PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

John Wall September 10, 2006 03:52PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Katherine Reece September 10, 2006 03:55PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

John Wall September 10, 2006 03:59PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Katherine Reece September 10, 2006 04:03PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

John Wall September 10, 2006 04:06PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Katherine Reece September 10, 2006 04:08PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

John Wall September 10, 2006 03:50PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Dave L September 10, 2006 05:22PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

John Wall September 10, 2006 05:28PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Dave L September 10, 2006 05:32PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

John Wall September 10, 2006 05:38PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Dave L September 10, 2006 05:32PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Dave L September 10, 2006 06:16PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

John Wall September 10, 2006 06:18PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Dave L September 10, 2006 06:26PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

John Wall September 11, 2006 01:55AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

DDeden September 10, 2006 07:33PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

John Wall September 11, 2006 02:04AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Dave L September 11, 2006 06:45AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

John Wall September 11, 2006 06:48AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

DDeden September 11, 2006 12:32PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

John Wall September 11, 2006 12:35PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Frank D September 12, 2006 06:00AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

John Wall September 12, 2006 06:01AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

JC September 10, 2006 02:40AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Goldcalf September 10, 2006 09:33AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Warwick L Nixon September 10, 2006 09:44AM

Goldcalf please read

Katherine Reece September 10, 2006 10:12AM

Re: Goldcalf please read

Goldcalf September 10, 2006 11:24AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Goldcalf September 10, 2006 02:20PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Warwick L Nixon September 10, 2006 09:15AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Goldcalf September 10, 2006 01:26PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

John Wall September 10, 2006 01:47PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Goldcalf September 10, 2006 01:56PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

John Wall September 10, 2006 02:01PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

MJ Thomas September 10, 2006 04:31PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

John Wall September 10, 2006 04:35PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

MJ Thomas September 10, 2006 04:56PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

John Wall September 10, 2006 05:02PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

MJ Thomas September 10, 2006 05:13PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

MJ Thomas September 10, 2006 01:58PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

JQ Jacobs September 10, 2006 01:04PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Goldcalf September 10, 2006 01:54PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Rebby September 10, 2006 02:22PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

John Wall September 10, 2006 02:24PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Rebby September 10, 2006 03:39PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

John Wall September 10, 2006 03:53PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Katherine Reece September 10, 2006 03:57PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

John Wall September 10, 2006 04:02PM

ROTFLMBAO

Rebby September 10, 2006 04:39PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Goldcalf September 10, 2006 05:45PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Ritva Kurittu September 10, 2006 06:51PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Elizabeth Newton September 10, 2006 10:35PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Dave L September 11, 2006 06:47AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

MJ Thomas September 11, 2006 05:04AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Byrd September 11, 2006 09:48AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Ken B. September 10, 2006 02:08PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

John Wall September 10, 2006 02:15PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Goldcalf September 10, 2006 02:25PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

John Wall September 10, 2006 02:29PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Goldcalf September 10, 2006 02:34PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

John Wall September 10, 2006 02:37PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Goldcalf September 10, 2006 02:45PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

John Wall September 10, 2006 02:49PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Goldcalf September 10, 2006 03:22PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Katherine Reece September 10, 2006 03:38PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Goldcalf September 10, 2006 05:14PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Rebby September 10, 2006 03:49PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Goldcalf September 10, 2006 05:23PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Dave L September 10, 2006 05:29PM

Moderation Note

Katherine Reece September 10, 2006 05:49PM

Re: Moderation Note

Goldcalf September 10, 2006 08:14PM

Re: Moderation Note

Katherine Reece September 10, 2006 10:48PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Byrd September 10, 2006 04:08PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Goldcalf September 10, 2006 05:25PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

JQ Jacobs September 10, 2006 04:31PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Goldcalf September 10, 2006 05:26PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

JQ Jacobs September 10, 2006 05:10PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Goldcalf September 10, 2006 05:28PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Goldcalf September 10, 2006 08:30PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Rebby September 10, 2006 11:16PM

There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

Dave L September 11, 2006 06:56AM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

MJ Thomas September 11, 2006 07:33AM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

John Wall September 11, 2006 07:37AM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

MJ Thomas September 11, 2006 07:44AM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

Dave L September 11, 2006 07:47AM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

John Wall September 11, 2006 07:49AM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

Dave L September 11, 2006 07:46AM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

John Wall September 11, 2006 07:55AM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

Dave L September 11, 2006 08:05AM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

John Wall September 11, 2006 08:16AM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

lobo-hotei September 11, 2006 10:30AM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

Warwick L Nixon September 11, 2006 11:12AM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

Warwick L Nixon September 11, 2006 02:58PM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

MJ Thomas September 11, 2006 04:14PM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

John Wall September 11, 2006 04:17PM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

MJ Thomas September 11, 2006 04:36PM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

John Wall September 11, 2006 04:41PM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

Dave L September 11, 2006 02:37PM

I'm talking about building it.

Warwick L Nixon September 11, 2006 03:12PM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

John Wall September 11, 2006 03:37PM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

lobo-hotei September 11, 2006 10:23AM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

John Wall September 11, 2006 10:34AM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

lobo-hotei September 11, 2006 10:43AM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

Warwick L Nixon September 11, 2006 10:47AM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

MJ Thomas September 11, 2006 12:30PM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

lobo-hotei September 11, 2006 04:49PM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

MJ Thomas September 12, 2006 05:50AM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

MJ Thomas September 12, 2006 11:52AM

There is a mystery

JQ Jacobs September 11, 2006 01:43PM

Re: There is a mystery

John Wall September 11, 2006 02:02PM

Re: There is a mystery

JQ Jacobs September 11, 2006 02:28PM

Re: There is a mystery

John Wall September 11, 2006 02:36PM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

MJ Thomas September 11, 2006 10:26AM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

Rebby September 11, 2006 09:00AM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

John Wall September 11, 2006 09:06AM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

Rebby September 11, 2006 09:20AM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

John Wall September 11, 2006 09:23AM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

lobo-hotei September 11, 2006 10:33AM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

Dave L September 11, 2006 11:56AM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

Warwick L Nixon September 11, 2006 12:05PM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

John Wall September 11, 2006 12:07PM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

MJ Thomas September 11, 2006 12:50PM

Re: There is no mystery - just read the texts properly

Warwick L Nixon September 11, 2006 01:01PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Goldcalf September 11, 2006 08:04AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

John Wall September 11, 2006 08:06AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Warwick L Nixon September 11, 2006 09:38AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Hermione September 11, 2006 07:37AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

lobo-hotei September 11, 2006 10:04AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

JQ Jacobs September 11, 2006 02:00PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

cicely September 11, 2006 10:51AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Goldcalf September 11, 2006 05:01PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

John Wall September 11, 2006 05:03PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Goldcalf September 11, 2006 05:46PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

John Wall September 11, 2006 05:50PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

cicely September 11, 2006 08:19PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Goldcalf September 11, 2006 09:49PM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Hermione September 12, 2006 03:33AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Warwick L Nixon September 12, 2006 10:17AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Jammer September 14, 2006 10:30AM

Re: New GP hexagram theory

Warwick L Nixon September 14, 2006 10:34AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login