Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 15, 2024, 2:40 am UTC    
September 07, 2006 06:16PM
Forgive me for being contentious (I have been a part of the Magickal tradition since 1965) but I'd like to see some proof of what you say below.

Goldcalf Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That's how they made magical talismans. They
> didn't show the magic figures overtly. Instead,
> they would construct an image in such a way that
> the figures were like an invisible skeleton.
> Often, they would make it so that only some key
> parts of the figures were actually contained
> within the image, the rest being outside the
> borders of the images.The talisman was like a
> condensed version of the magical figures. It's
> kind of like a hologram. If you have any one
> significant sized part of the figure, it's like
> having the whole thing.


In particular, I'd like to see some evidence, please, that this is standard magical/magickal procedure and that this is a standard Egyptian procedure.

Something beyond "I can make this fit into this diagram!"... something, say, like references in the original hieroglyphics to making these objects and inscribing them within squares and circles and talismans/magical objects made this way.

They did have instructions for making talismans.

I don't know of any that included making geometric figures (they were never as enamored of them as the Pythagoreans), but I'm certainly willing to be educated on this. So please give us some links that show that the Egyptians of that era used these methods in making talismans.
Subject Author Posted

Great Pyramid geometry

Goldcalf September 07, 2006 08:09AM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

Ritva Kurittu September 07, 2006 08:11AM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

Warwick L Nixon September 07, 2006 10:28AM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

Goldcalf September 07, 2006 05:19PM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

Warwick L Nixon September 08, 2006 10:18AM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

Steve LeMaster September 08, 2006 10:19AM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

Byrd September 07, 2006 10:11AM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

Goldcalf September 07, 2006 05:34PM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

goaten September 07, 2006 06:15PM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

Goldcalf September 07, 2006 07:17PM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

MJ Thomas September 08, 2006 03:36AM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

Gerd VDC September 08, 2006 05:28AM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

Warwick L Nixon September 08, 2006 10:22AM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

Byrd September 07, 2006 06:16PM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

Goldcalf September 07, 2006 07:07PM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

Gerd VDC September 08, 2006 05:33AM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

Goldcalf September 08, 2006 07:32AM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

Hermione September 08, 2006 07:37AM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

Gerd VDC September 08, 2006 08:06AM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

Goldcalf September 08, 2006 05:29PM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

Anthony September 08, 2006 07:57AM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

Goldcalf September 08, 2006 05:37PM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

Warwick L Nixon September 08, 2006 09:45PM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

MJ Thomas September 08, 2006 09:01AM

Why bother?

Steve LeMaster September 08, 2006 09:21AM

Re: Why bother?

MJ Thomas September 08, 2006 12:16PM

Toungue and cheek

Steve LeMaster September 08, 2006 12:21PM

Re: Toungue and cheek

MJ Thomas September 08, 2006 01:06PM

Re: Toungue and cheek

Steve LeMaster September 08, 2006 01:29PM

No mystery

Dave L September 08, 2006 01:23PM

Re: No mystery

John Wall September 08, 2006 02:57PM

Moderation Note

Katherine Reece September 08, 2006 03:00PM

Re: No mystery

Dave L September 08, 2006 04:25PM

Re: No mystery

John Wall September 08, 2006 04:28PM

Re: No mystery

Goldcalf September 08, 2006 05:51PM

Re: No mystery

Dave L September 08, 2006 06:45PM

Re: No mystery

John Wall September 09, 2006 03:14AM

Re: No mystery

Dave L September 09, 2006 07:27AM

Re: No mystery

John Wall September 09, 2006 07:35AM

Re: No mystery

Dave L September 09, 2006 07:42AM

Re: No mystery

John Wall September 09, 2006 07:45AM

Re: No mystery

Dave L September 09, 2006 08:03AM

Re: No mystery

John Wall September 09, 2006 08:11AM

Re: No mystery

Dave L September 09, 2006 08:20AM

Re: No mystery

John Wall September 09, 2006 08:23AM

Re: No mystery

Dave L September 09, 2006 08:44AM

Re: No mystery

John Wall September 09, 2006 09:05AM

Re: No mystery

Dave L September 09, 2006 09:25AM

Re: No mystery

John Wall September 09, 2006 09:39AM

Re: No mystery

Dave L September 09, 2006 09:58AM

Re: No mystery

John Wall September 09, 2006 10:05AM

Re: No mystery

Dave L September 09, 2006 10:55AM

Re: No mystery

John Wall September 09, 2006 11:17AM

Re: No mystery

Katherine Reece September 09, 2006 11:24AM

Re: No mystery

John Wall September 09, 2006 11:29AM

Re: No mystery

Katherine Reece September 09, 2006 11:43AM

Re: No mystery

Dave L September 09, 2006 11:58AM

Re: No mystery

John Wall September 09, 2006 12:01PM

Re: Why bother?

Goldcalf September 08, 2006 05:44PM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

Goldcalf September 08, 2006 05:43PM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

lobo-hotei September 08, 2006 06:45PM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

MJ Thomas September 09, 2006 06:09AM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

MJ Thomas September 09, 2006 05:32AM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

goaten September 09, 2006 08:20AM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

Warwick L Nixon September 08, 2006 10:32AM

No, no Warwick

Steve LeMaster September 08, 2006 10:38AM

Re: No, no Warwick

Warwick L Nixon September 08, 2006 10:49AM

Re: No, no Warwick

Steve LeMaster September 08, 2006 01:30PM

Re: Great Pyramid geometry

Dave L September 07, 2006 07:24PM

Good heavens!

Steve LeMaster September 07, 2006 11:05PM

Closing the thread

Katherine Reece September 09, 2006 12:03PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.