Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 19, 2024, 10:43 am UTC    
February 10, 2006 07:11PM
I kinda agree with you Bob. I'm not the least bit of a co-regencist (reread militantly opposed to it. It's nothing more than an excuse to cover up gaps in the historical record or explain away atypical artwork. Or prop up some lame theory. I'm going on one of my rants here so I'll stop.) However the skeletal remains that are preserved strongly suggest that possibility. Tut was 19 Smenkhare 20 or 21 (assuming it's tut.) Kiya's canopic looks incredibly young (allowing for artistic conventions.). In addition to that the Amarna letters make it pretty clear that all the bride trading was for young girls who had probably just reached puberty. 13 or 14 maybe 15 tops. We might have to revise Akhs age from the 40 or so that is attributed to him back down to 30 or so maybe even younger.
Subject Author Posted

KV63 Press Conference 1500 GMT

John Wall February 10, 2006 08:11AM

Re: KV63 Press Conference 1500 GMT

Ritva Kurittu February 10, 2006 11:22AM

Re: KV63 Press Conference 1500 GMT

Katherine Reece February 10, 2006 11:33AM

More news ... at least one mummy visable

Katherine Reece February 10, 2006 11:34AM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Don Barone February 10, 2006 12:48PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Katherine Reece February 10, 2006 12:57PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Don Barone February 10, 2006 01:30PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Katherine Reece February 10, 2006 01:41PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Pete Vanderzwet February 10, 2006 01:46PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Katherine Reece February 10, 2006 01:54PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Pete Vanderzwet February 10, 2006 02:00PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Rick Baudé February 10, 2006 02:11PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Pete Vanderzwet February 10, 2006 02:49PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Rick Baudé February 10, 2006 03:08PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Bob Wickland February 10, 2006 06:57PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Rick Baudé February 10, 2006 07:11PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Bob Wickland February 10, 2006 07:45PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Katherine Reece February 10, 2006 02:15PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Rick Baudé February 10, 2006 02:25PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

cicely February 10, 2006 03:08PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Rick Baudé February 10, 2006 03:11PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Katherine Reece February 10, 2006 03:16PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Pete Vanderzwet February 10, 2006 03:21PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Katherine Reece February 10, 2006 03:27PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Rick Baudé February 10, 2006 03:34PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Katherine Reece February 10, 2006 03:39PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Pete Vanderzwet February 10, 2006 03:41PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Ritva Kurittu February 10, 2006 03:43PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Pete Vanderzwet February 10, 2006 03:48PM

*just to add...*

Pete Vanderzwet February 10, 2006 03:50PM

Also consider...

Pete Vanderzwet February 10, 2006 03:53PM

Re: Also consider...

Katherine Reece February 10, 2006 03:56PM

Re: Also consider...

Ritva Kurittu February 10, 2006 04:04PM

Re: Also consider...

Bob Wickland February 10, 2006 08:56PM

Re: Also consider...

Bob Wickland February 10, 2006 08:45PM

Title?

Katherine Reece February 10, 2006 08:53PM

Re: Title?

Bob Wickland February 10, 2006 09:16PM

Re: Title?

Katherine Reece February 10, 2006 09:28PM

Re: Title?

Bob Wickland February 10, 2006 09:54PM

Re: Also consider...

Rick Baudé February 10, 2006 10:47PM

Armies of the Sun King

Katherine Reece February 10, 2006 10:51PM

Re: Armies of the Sun King

Bob Wickland February 10, 2006 11:08PM

Re: Also consider...

Bob Wickland February 10, 2006 11:06PM

Re: Also consider...

John Wall February 11, 2006 04:22AM

Re: Also consider...

Bob Wickland February 11, 2006 05:01AM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Katherine Reece February 10, 2006 03:53PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Pete Vanderzwet February 10, 2006 04:02PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Ritva Kurittu February 10, 2006 04:05PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Pete Vanderzwet February 10, 2006 04:24PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Katherine Reece February 10, 2006 04:27PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Ritva Kurittu February 10, 2006 04:49PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Doug M February 10, 2006 08:14PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Ritva Kurittu February 10, 2006 10:02PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Doug M February 11, 2006 03:36AM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

John Wall February 11, 2006 04:28AM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Doug M February 11, 2006 09:18AM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Ritva Kurittu February 10, 2006 04:46PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Pete Vanderzwet February 10, 2006 07:57PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Bob Wickland February 10, 2006 09:36PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Ritva Kurittu February 10, 2006 04:00PM

Ay...

Katherine Reece February 10, 2006 04:05PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Bob Wickland February 10, 2006 08:40PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Katherine Reece February 10, 2006 03:45PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Ritva Kurittu February 10, 2006 03:45PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Bob Wickland February 10, 2006 07:18PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Pete Vanderzwet February 10, 2006 02:50PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Bob Wickland February 10, 2006 10:14PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Pete Vanderzwet February 10, 2006 01:41PM

Re: More news ... at least one mummy visable

Bob Wickland February 10, 2006 10:19PM

Re: KV63 Press Conference 1500 GMT

Simon February 10, 2006 11:58AM

Re: KV63 Press Conference 1500 GMT

Katherine Reece February 10, 2006 12:10PM

Re: KV63 Press Conference 1500 GMT

darkuser February 10, 2006 03:40PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login