Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 18, 2024, 5:33 pm UTC    
November 03, 2005 12:33PM
Hmmm I found this...
Quote

El Paraíso is considered a residential complex; the two large mounds
were used for habitation. It resembles later residential architecture,
and no artifacts anomalous to domestic use are known (Moseley and
Willey 1973:464; Williams 1980:101). The architecture includes courts
and rooms interconnected by corridors (Moseley 1978:512). At the same
time the site manifests a high degree of planning and is uniformly
oriented 25Á east of north, perpendicular to the 1500 B.C solstice
sunrise, as is the Piedra Parada site, located two miles inland from
Aspero (Quilter 1991:417).

From here: [saturniancosmology.org]

Unfortunately I can't get the 1991 paper by Quilter that this references .. the database I have for that journal only goes back to 1998.

Kat

Ma'at Moderator Pull Hair Out

Founder and Director of The Hall of Ma'at

Contributing author to Archaeological Fantasies:
How pseudoarchaeology misrepresents the past and misleads the public

"If you panic, you're lost" -- W. T. 'Watertight' Southard
Subject Author Posted

Geoglyph find at Caral, natural or built?

Hans November 02, 2005 12:28PM

Re: Geoglyph find at Caral, natural or built?

Lee November 02, 2005 01:09PM

Re: Geoglyph find at Caral, natural or built?

Katherine Reece November 02, 2005 06:29PM

Re: Geoglyph find at Caral, natural or built?

Marduk November 02, 2005 11:53PM

Re: Geoglyph find at Caral, natural or built?

Katherine Reece November 02, 2005 11:54PM

Re: Geoglyph find at Caral, natural or built?

Katherine Reece November 03, 2005 10:25AM

Re: Geoglyph find at Caral, natural or built?

Katherine Reece November 03, 2005 12:33PM

Correction to my post ....

Katherine Reece November 03, 2005 10:09AM

Re: Correction to my post ....

Salsassin November 23, 2005 09:20PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login