<HTML>Bent wrote:
>
> Hi Dave:
> My software is paper. I've been trying to get
> this out for over a month, now. Bauval's and Hancock's
> co-ordinates are screwed. There is no way that Leo can be in
> that position at equinox in 10500 B.C.
According to Keeper of Genesis (Chapter 17), the diagram shows the position of the Sun at "cross-quarter sunrise" between Winter Solstice and Spring Equinox.
Their co-ordinates are screwed anyway. It's what you get from using such an inacurate package like Skyglobe...
>
> If you give me a couple of days I would be more than happy to
> send you the proof.
Thank you.
> How soon do you have to have the article
> on GHMB?
>
I'm not putting it on GHMB (yet). I'm going to write a full article investigating the archaeoastronomical aspects of the dating of the Giza Plateau to 10500 BC by RB and GH.
Best Regards,
Dave
> Thanks
> BentDave Moore wrote:
> >
> > Bent wrote:
> > >
> > > Dave:
> > > If your software is correct, the date you're
> showing
> > > is about the 1st of Feb. 10085 B.C..
> > >
> >
> > March 24th Gregorian/June 13th Julian 10500 BC. It's the
> > closest I could get to the configuration that Bauval has in
> > Keeper of Genesis/Message of the Sphinx.
> >
> > What software are you using Bent? Is there a demo of it
> > available?
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Dave</HTML>
