sdelaney Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think it may have been Paul H. who provided a
> comprehensive message with various links and
> references which utterly destroyed the possibility
> of the 250,000 bp dates for this site. Basically,
> there were huge holes in the dating methods used.
> Perhaps someone could direct us to that message
> before we go down that rat hole again.
>
> Steve D.

That's probably the post on my site:
[www.ramtops.co.uk]

Doug




Doug Weller

Director The Hall of Ma'at
Doug's Skeptical Archaeology site::
[www.ramtops.co.uk]