<HTML>Hi All:
May I assume that the vast majority on this board feel that:
a) Blood has been found
b) It is probably an archaeologist's blood ( I mean really ! ) or if not
c) It can't possibly contain enough DNA to duplicate or measure
d) the original discoverers ( gee weren't they scientists ) LIED TO US !
e) All of the above ?
f) The original claim is genuine and correct
Is there anybody out there who believes the original claim ?
My vote is ..... ( drum roll ) Oh no, no way are you guys going to pounce all over me. Just me and the good lord know what my opinion is !
)
Best Regards
Don Barone</HTML>