Jammer wrote:Than how come your automobile doesn't climb stairs at hills?
I think that would be because it has round wheels? I am sure if the automobile had feet stairs would be more appropriate.
Regards,
Jacob
by
Sirfiroth
-
Ancient Egypt
Hi Hans,
It is designated G1d and some believe it was used in the layout of G1 as it is a 1/10 model.
<;
South of Khufu's pyramid lies the small pyramid G1d, which measures 23 x 23m, with an angle of inclination of 52° [3]. It is interesting, that 23.05m are exactly 44 cubits, which again are a tenth of the side length of Khufu's pyramid (440 cubits). This satellite pyramid wa
by
Sirfiroth
-
Ancient Egypt
Khazar-khum wrote: By this logic, everything in the GP was put in place before the thing was sealed. I hope Khufu had the good grace to die on schedule, and not wreck everyone's plans by outliving the construction.
Please list everything found within the pyramid G1 that was not in situ?
Regards,
Jacob
by
Sirfiroth
-
Ancient Egypt
Jammer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> clem ciamarra Wrote:
> > anyhow, 2 boats can fit in the gp.
>
> Which completely ignores my original post, to
> wit;
>
> If Djedefre insisted on the boats, and the little
> data we have indicates he did,
> are you SERIOUSLY claiming he would have reopened
> his father's tom
by
Sirfiroth
-
Ancient Egypt
Chris Tedder Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sirfiroth: “G1 and G2 both radio carbon dated to
> around 3100 B.C.”
>
>
> The latest radiocarbon dates ((2613 – 2498) of
> short-lived plant remains from museum collections
> (seeds, basketry, plant-based textiles, plant
> stems, fruits etc.) directly associated with the
> reigns
by
Sirfiroth
-
Ancient Egypt
Hi Rick,
Rick Baude wrote: ONE boat pit had a volume of 2, 856 pit and there were three of them
What is the volume was occupied by the actual boat in dissassembled condition?
Fact:
Few inscriptions relative to Khufu's complex at Giza have ever been found, so controversy surrounds many of its elements, including his boats.
Now for a little speculation:
Scholars continue to s
by
Sirfiroth
-
Ancient Egypt
Hi B.A.
Pistol Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> which begs the question: Why, with all the cordage
> and wood available have the experts not done c-14
> testing....are they affraid of the answer? It just
> might be the case that these boats are far too old
> to be those of Khufu. Now if, in my view, Khufu
> built over and around an older
by
Sirfiroth
-
Ancient Egypt
Hi Clemente,
And some wonder why there is speculation? Why there is doubt and alternative theories manifesting in what is referred to by some here, a fantasy land? To say something is one thing, to prove it is an entirely different proposition. Evidently it never occurred to Egyptology, because of these type responses, the answers to these questions must lay outside the body of mainstream know
by
Sirfiroth
-
Ancient Egypt
Hi Clem,
Pistol wrote: If the king has shafts to travel through shouldnt they lead to a boat? Isnt that what happens? if so, why is the king place way up inside the pyramid and the boats are underground outside of the pyramid?
As a vessel to be employed in the afterlife why would the king bury it outside his pyramid? furthermore, I thought the king was to travel at the fore of Ra's ba
by
Sirfiroth
-
Ancient Egypt
Hi B,A.
From my perspective you did ask an excellent question. So far the responses in this thread contain a great deal of speculation and assumption built on scant evidence. Instead of admitting there is not enough evidence to actually state the intended purpose of either the shafts or the boats it seems necessary to make up stories (speculate) that makes sense to the established consensus.
by
Sirfiroth
-
Ancient Egypt
Khazar-khum Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > Reisner delayed opening the sarcophagus and
> > canopic chest until the rest of the tomb was
> > cleared and properly recorded. And then on
> March 3
> > 1927, before a group of distinguished
> gentlemen,
> > the order was given to raise the sarcophagus
> lid -
> &
by
Sirfiroth
-
Ancient Egypt
Rick Baudé Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Do you guys actually read anything on Egyptology?
Who is you guys? I personally read plenty on Ancient Egypt when I can find something that is not based on assumptions and speculation.
> You act like this is some fresh and original
> question that never been posed before.
I have never received an
by
Sirfiroth
-
Ancient Egypt
Khazar-khum Wrote:
__________________________________________
> >Sirfiroth wrote:
> > Actually when studied in detail there is
> much
> > speculation within the tomb theory which
> seems to
> > be poorly supported assumptions and
> conjecture
> > arrived at by consensus. If there were solid
> > evidence we would not be having this
> conv
by
Sirfiroth
-
Ancient Egypt
Hi Hermione,
It is amazing to me how these threads get sidetracked and completly ignore the original post.
I have maintained for years the Ancient Egyptians concepts were based on the cube and the sphere the source of the 5 1/2 seked. Now it seems the evidence is leading in the direction of the hekat having a spherical origin based on the cubit.
As shown in: Problems 35-38 in the Rhind
by
Sirfiroth
-
Ancient Egypt
Rick Baudé Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yes and the reality is nobody can say for certain
> whether a particular pyramid is a stargate or a
> taco stand. This is classic strawman arguments. We
> can say they're tombs because it's never been
> demonstrated that the AE's were building pyramids
> as anything other than tom
by
Sirfiroth
-
Ancient Egypt
Khazar-khum Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thank you.
>
> That's a start. Over time, though, I would have
> expected there to be more original work. Most of
> the pyramid speculation seems to start from the
> non-tomb argument and deteriorate from there.
Actually when studied in detail there is much speculation within the tomb th
by
Sirfiroth
-
Ancient Egypt
clem ciamarra Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> The concept of the Egyptian cenotaph is not fully
> understood.
That sir, is the most truthful statement about the cenotaph that has been made to date
IMHO, the term can also be used to describe structures built for the ka, meaning: not to house the spirit, but to commemorate the spirit!
Reg
by
Sirfiroth
-
Ancient Egypt
Hi KK,
Khazar-khum wrote: I do not understand the overt obsession with the GP. It is a pile of stone, built as a tomb. Yet somehow, out of all the monumental constructs of ancient Egypt, this one single building has attracted mountains of comments. Why?
Let me attempt to answer your question. IMHO, It is because of the fascinating theories put forth by Charles Piazzi Smyth in “Our Inheritan
by
Sirfiroth
-
Ancient Egypt
Hi Lee,
Lee Olsen wrote: There isn't one iota of evidence for Neandertal reed boats or any other type of watercraft.
Not when they can surf tidal waves to reach these islands!
Regards,
Jacob
by
Sirfiroth
-
Ancient History
Hi Rick,
A giant tower of babble?
Regards,
Jacob
by
Sirfiroth
-
Ancient Egypt
Hi Donald
donald r raab Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Now I'm wondering about something.
>
> 1. There are multiple shafts going multiple ways
> in the pyramids.
Just two directions, North and South
> 2. Just how would these shafts be constructed as
> the larger pyramid building process took place?
Now I could be wrong
by
Sirfiroth
-
Ancient Egypt
Hi All,
A site just a few kilometres away called San Bartolo, Guatemala.
The Xultun find is the first place that all of the cycles have been found tied mathematically together in one place, representing a calendar that stretches more than 7,000 years into the future.
Sadly, this is not likely to change the mind of the one in 10 who believes the world will end.
Regards,
Jacob
by
Sirfiroth
-
Apocalypse
It is fake, there are motors in the wings as the man could only supply five percent of the power necessary for sustained flight.
""According to the former Coventry student, his own body strength was only capable of providing five per cent of the necessary power so to make up the shortfall he fitted extra motors to the wing suit.”
by
Sirfiroth
-
Humanities
Hi MJ,
MJ Thomas 2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sirfiroth Wrote:
>
> > side 11 units to diameter 14 units 11/14
> (run-rise
> > of the 5 1/2 seked)
>
> Hello Jacob,
>
> The run-rise of seked 5 1/2 is not 11/14, it is
> 5+1/2 palms run to 7 palms rise.
> If one is going to create a formula which involves
by
Sirfiroth
-
Alternative Geometry and Numerology
Hi RLH
RLH Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hello All
>
> I was wondering if there was a way for the AE to
> have solved for diameter with a known
> circumference without using (22/7 = pi).
Yes there is, G1 demonstrates the process. (shown below)
> The key to what I came up with is 28/33. I’m not
> aware of them using this in
by
Sirfiroth
-
Alternative Geometry and Numerology
Hi MJ,
Sorry for the late reply, having router problems.
MJ Thomas 2 wrote: So, Jacob, what evidence do you have (apart from what is implied through the formulae you created) for the AEs using the sexagesimal system?
Start with the first of the big pyramids at Saqqura designed by Imhothep for Djoser Called the step pyramid
Number of steps: 6
Slope of steps: 72º (6 * 12 = 72) (8 * 9
by
Sirfiroth
-
Alternative Geometry and Numerology
Hi MJ,
MJT wrote: I'm still waiting for Jacob to identify the number 6 in his formula.
A cyclic hexagon is any hexagon inscribed in a circle. If the successive sides of the cyclic hexagon are a, b, c, d, e, f, then the three main diagonals intersect in a single point if and only if ace = bdf.
MJ, Sexagesimal system is based on 60, in a circle 60º equals 1/6 the circumference a cir
by
Sirfiroth
-
Alternative Geometry and Numerology
affiliator Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sirfiroth Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Hi Nick,
> >
> > If you wish to prove pi as the ratio used by
> the
> > Ancient Egyptians you are free to do so
>
> Hi Jacob
>
> Woah, stop right there. I am not seeking to prov
by
Sirfiroth
-
Alternative Geometry and Numerology
Hi Jammer,
Thank you for your opinion that is only based on assumptions. And no it does not effect my calculations.
Perhaps it is you who should reexamine the Cubit Rods on display at Turin Museum. We have had this conversation before; <;
There are different scales on the same rods not all 28 subdivisions and the scale lengths vary among the surviving rods there are all different length
by
Sirfiroth
-
Alternative Geometry and Numerology
Hi MJ,
MJ Thomas 2 wrote: Sixthly and lastly, I find Jacob’s formula to be quite nonsensical.
LOL, You are very good at making statements regarding things that elude your comprehension. My hypothesis is much less nonsensical than your arbitrary proposal built on opinion, assumptions and conjecture, MJ. If there is any firm evidence stating the length of the cubit please provide citations.
by
Sirfiroth
-
Alternative Geometry and Numerology