Page 1 of 68
Pages: 12345
Results 1 — 30 of 2035
They worked with stone for centuries yet laying a stone pathway with channels cut into them for the runners on the sledges never crossed their mind?
Water in that heat would evaporate quickly I would go for oil or melted fat as it would last longer and congeal at night when colder.
You could even have a drainage chan el at the bottom of grade to collect the oil to be reused.
After congealed f
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient History
Not much at all. Which is why I tend to stop at the 1/5602 when I use my value for Pi in unit frations.
AND I have read about how they use unit fractions. I have been doing them for quite a bit of time on here and GHMB.
There was no insult to my link just showing various degrees of accuracy for Pi and, as is often the case, different ways to get an answer with unit fractions.
I am not ob
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
Pistol Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Clearly the Egyptians had the ability and desire
> to refine 3 + 1/7 when the need arose, the
> evidence says so.
>
> 3 + 1/8 + 1/60 + 1/30,000 was far easier and exact
> in the minds of the AE men who cared, you or me
> today would find it complex and difficult to think
> in the same term
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And it always comes
> down to the same problem; if you build a ramp then
> you have to drag 6 1/2 million tons of stones up
> it. It's this last part that is the most absurd,
> not the difficulty of building and tearing down
> ramps.
LOL!!! You don't even understand what you typ
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
Only thing "like" a heron is your constantly changing fantasy, flighty as hell!
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> lobo-hotei Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > That was rhetorical by the way as everyone
> knows
> > already.
>
> Figures. I'm the one who doesn't.
Not surprised.
>
> > Nope. You have been throwing the idiotic
> be
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The subject of the thread is how they built the
> pyramid
So why have you done nothing but soapbox your blind faith beliefs?
That was rhetorical by the way as everyone knows already.
>but more specifically that ramps are
> debunked as a means to have lifted the stones for
> G1.
Nope. Y
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
Jammer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> cladking Wrote:
> > And if they were covered up under layer upon
> layer
> > of ramps it would likely be impossible for
> them to
> > be perfect.
>
> Completely untrue.
>
> Each face would be covered by the ramp only AFTER
> that face was completed.
>
> When
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Tommi Huhtamaki Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Exactly. There is no reason to think they
> would
> > have seen the building of a ramp as somehow
> > separated from the rest of the project.
>
> But we have an "Overseer of the Side of
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mostly it's about interpretation of evidence.
> There are hundreds of data points but most are
> about interpretation rather than proof.
The most honest thing I have read from you.
Scientist use scientific, verified methods. You use the "faces in the clouds" method.
Back home they
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> While these runs were
> easily moved a little it's likely that the eastern
> run was a straight shot due north 300' long down
> the the 225' cliff face and positioned along the
> line that runs between the "queens pyramids" and
> the first row of mastabas.
This "run
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Were I not familiar with what the builders said
> I'd agree with you that they are probably tombs.
Thank you Cladking for your honesty!!!
Since you have proven numerous times you don't know squat about what the AE did, wrote, knew, believed and/or meant then your own statement above shows you a
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
Gary Daniels Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You stated: "So this "any light in the sky" symbol
> you are discussing covers the stars, planets, moon
> and the sun? "
>
> No,they had separate symbols for the moon,comets,
> and "guest stars" (supernovas/comets that had yet
> to form a tail...i.e., temporary
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient History
I like that the "unmoving" experts change the "official story" when evidence is put forth. Too bad some other "types" tend to ignore this evidence along with any other evidence that proves them, and their latest conspiracy theory about orthos/experts, wrong!
And that pic is of one big, BIG skull! Been there, seen that! The rest of the museum is great too!
A
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient History
Gary Daniels Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And your point?
>
> Yes, I think the translators got it wrong. I don't
> think the circled-dot (circumpunct) is solely a
> sun symbol. I think the circumpunct is used to
> represent any light in the sky, sun or star.
So this "any light in the sky" symbol you are discussing cov
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient History
Back home we call that talking out your backside.
So far from reading your posts that is about the only thing I can believe you are knowledgable/expert about.
Just more crap.
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
Too bad you can't see the truth in the words you typed. Only you think they should be aimed at others.
I will take this to mean you can't answer the question, fully, truthfully, or even accurately.
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
I opened your post saw how long it was and after reading about two sentences confirmed it was more of the same stuff you type.
Wanna point to the short piece in there that answers the simple question?
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
I'm talking about Clad's assumptions that pulling a heavy weight on a flat object on the ground is no harder then the same weight on an object with less surface area in contact with the ground and that being in a lubed channel.
Once in motion the rough surface area will be digging into the other surface/ground, resistance.
It would be easy to pull the flat object on a lubed surfac
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
These grooves you insist were for dragging up the side of the pyramid a contraption full of stone blocks.
Why is the groove equal in what appears width and depth from base to pinnacle?
The wear would be more severe at the base, years of dragging, where as the very top few layers should have none as very few would "theoretically" have been dragged across that surface.
No "I
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
As usual you haven't a clue.
You grant troughs/slots/guides for your water slide but then take that ability away from the AE when it is a ramp idea.
The AE create a guide/trough for your bull-butt slie to stay in as it ascends so it doesn't go all over the side of the pyramid BUT somehow they can't create two grooves in the surface of the ramp to focus/limit/control lubricant
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
In your fantasies!
With all the hot air and BS you type you could fill hundreds of Zepphyrs and float the stones in place!
Here people want evidence not fantasy and naive interpretations! Elsewhere they are happy with your fairy tales.
The only way you could save manpower with your fantasy is magical geysers! Since no geysers were there to help build the pyramids they would have to lift
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
It is blatant to those willing to be inclusive of most ideas with MERIT.
Cladking's blind faith theory is based solely on a personal interpretation of text to support his wild idea. And to work "They must not have used ramps" of any kind which is why he refuses to "see".
Nothing new.
Regards,
Lobo-hotei
lobo
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
RLH Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Do any of the MP’s have a problem to find the
> circumference of a circle when the diameter is
> known?
Don't think so.
> Would you agree that if the AE did not know the
> formula (A = pi r squared) then there would not
> be any reason for them to use pi(22/7)?
First there would need to
by
lobo-hotei
-
Alternative Geometry and Numerology
Pistol Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> as for marking out a base dimension Margins of
> error with these linear measurements typically
> increase distances, not shorten.
That is assuming you are using solid measuring instruments. Ropes would/could yield longer and shorter measurements depending on tension.
I doubt they used 440 cubit sticks and
by
lobo-hotei
-
Alternative Geometry and Numerology
The facts are the measurements, a conclusion is not a fact and neither is a belief based on imagining based on hero worship.
by
lobo-hotei
-
Alternative Geometry and Numerology
LMAO!!! BS!
IF they chose base and heights then you would have a wide variety of Sekeds.
Funny how many pyramids have the same Seked but a wide variety of base lengths and heights.
The seked was the constant. Lay out a roof pitch with a couple of chosen dimensions for hieght and length. It can be done but seldom, if ever, by architects/contractors who actually know what they are doing.
by
lobo-hotei
-
Alternative Geometry and Numerology
"IF we imagine...then we can conclude..."
How about proving it with "proof" instead of imagining it with belief?
How about you construct a design with the Seked 5.5 and NOT incorporate artefacts that relate to something similar to Pi(22/7)?
Can't be done. IF they knew Pi then what was it called and what was it's heiroglyph? Don't believe the answer into exi
by
lobo-hotei
-
Alternative Geometry and Numerology
Think they mean in cost of human lives if those suits didn't work well with the biohazard test.
I do agree with the rubble removing. IF they could lift a fallen wall and hold then they wouldn't tire out like a group of volunteeers.
Regards,
Lobo-hotei
lobo
by
lobo-hotei
-
Laboratory
Page 1 of 68
Pages: 12345