cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> The irony is in ancient language "four" wasn't
> even "defined" and was simply represented as "/ /
> / /".
>
> "Four" in Ancient Language was representative,
> digital, and metaphysical. It meant one single
> thing and could not be defined,. As such it also
> can not be translated because nobody knows which
> of the numerous definitions is intended. You must
> model it as "/ / / /". No more no less.

This is truly understating the problem in translation because AL was also binary and had no concept of four things. So "////" really meant one of four (////) plus two of four plus three of four plus four of four. They did not think like we do. They did not think at all and had no word for "think" or any abstraction. The pyramid builders were human enough but their "thinking" was alien to ours. They were each on the same page and in tune with each other and all of nature.

AL language will never be translated but it can be interpreted. Interpretation is made far easier by the simple fact that most of the time the intended meaning was expressed literally and in a language with fixed "definitions".

____________
Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.