You stated: "So this "any light in the sky" symbol you are discussing covers the stars, planets, moon and the sun? "

No,they had separate symbols for the moon,comets, and "guest stars" (supernovas/comets that had yet to form a tail...i.e., temporary lights in the sky). This is laid out in my research paper on the Forsyth Petroglyph. If you have a specific question after reading my Forsyth Petroglyph paper, fire away. But I'm not going to answer questions which are already laid out clearly in my paper.

Here's the paper:
[lostworlds.org]

Furthermore, the current topic is Mayan glyphs on Swift Creek pottery. How does your question relate to this?

It appears no one wants to actually deal with the main topic....they want to discuss all these side topics. The only attempt at debunking was by Hermione whose best argument was "well they don't look EXACTLY like their Mayan counterparts." But of course, even the same mayan glyphs in different locales don't look the same in every place. So by that argument I guess she's saying all the Mayan experts are wrong when they say all these different looking glyphs actually have the same meaning. By her logic, if it's not identical it's not the same.

But other than that everyone seems stuck on a relatively minor point that circumpuncts represent not just the sun but also stars as if debunking this will somehow disprove my whole argument regarding Mayan glyphs on Swift Creek pottery. It won't.

What about the diamond-cross design? What about the jaguar-rattlesnake design. Debunk those. Please.