Very bizarre. I am trying to figure how this "mass" is staying with the solid body that is tumbling thru it as it spins and twists. Does this thing actually have enough mass to have a weak gravity?
I know little resisitance in space and the mass is moving at a relative speed but as it twists and tumbles it would create it's own "wind"/turbulence from the jets that woul
by
lobo-hotei
-
Laboratory
Drumstick comet?
Cool pics! Great shots of what appears to be outgassing though don't know if it is or not.
Wonder why it is smoother looking in the middle sections but has the rougher texture around each end?
Regards,
Lobo-hotei
lobo
by
lobo-hotei
-
Laboratory
And suggested here as well but not accepted by those who are absolutely certain it couldn't be such.
Not suprising.
by
lobo-hotei
-
Humanities
Heck yeah it was hard. Only last 1/3rd of solution was the same as mine.
For those who want to try it here is a link to a online moveable puzzle.
Regards,
Lobo-hotei
lobo
by
lobo-hotei
-
Coffee Shop
Because you say so? lol
by
lobo-hotei
-
Humanities
WVK Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> cladking Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > WVK Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> >
> > > Imagine a windlass in the shape of a
> > dumbbell. The
> > > rope attached to th
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This sounds much more practical than the first
> method but it does share some of the problems. A
> line of ten men atop the pyramid pulling a stone
> up the side could do the same work as the 10: 1
> windlass in much less time.
And yet you constantly claim,even below in this post, that there wa
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WVK Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > How about a windlass?
> >
>
> It's not applicable to this process. Turning the
> crank would require too much effort and the drum
> would have to be enormous to hold the rope to lift
> stones so
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> lobo-hotei Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You lying about that doesn't prove squat for
> you.
>
> I'm not here to teach physics.
Obviously, since you don't seem to understand it. That statement wasn't towards physics. Here'
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> lobo-hotei Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Quote:His usage of them in the diagram
> > accomplishes two goals; it makes the job far
> more
> > difficult and each time they're used all work
> has
> > to come to a screeching stop. Thi
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
QuoteHis usage of them in the diagram accomplishes two goals; it makes the job far more difficult and each time they're used all work has to come to a screeching stop. This is not a viable way to build a pyramid even if protopulleys actually might work.
Forgetting chronological possibility here, prove yourself correct.
How would it be easier to pull blocks up the side of pyramids withou
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
Principia Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You misunderstood. Perhaps I didn't explain it
> well enough - apologies. The distance relationship
> of the MTs is different from the apex distance
> relationships. This fact is shown when an asterism
> overlay with the apex's leaves the '(mis-)match
> with Menkaure's /\ at
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
Principia Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The MTs are not in the same realtive positions to
> each other.
Really? So the three MTs aren't centered on the east side of all three pyramids?
Being as they are all butted up against the pyramids, assuming the above answer is yes, then would the three MTs be approximately(can paste a definition if
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
Principia Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> To be specific, c.150ft for the pinnacle offset
> and within 45ft for the MTs.
So IF the AE were limited to their accuracy in drawing the asterism and people are accepting 150 feet error for the pyramids mimicing the stars within this aterism as acceptable then how can you claim a higher accuracy for the M
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
But how could they measure that small difference if they had no smaller measurement?
They could say 1/7th of a cubit because they had the palm.
They could say 1/28th of a cubit because they had the digit.
They could say 1/448th of a cubit because they had the 1/16th of a digit.
How could they say they 1/71686ths of a cubit without being able to measure thinner than perhaps 1/2 the 1/448th
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
Calm your ego stroking down there fella. I only brought up the 1/16th division as a limit on the accuracy of the AE measuring the Asterism NOT laying it out or building it.
IF the 1/16th was the smallest measurement they had then they could have up to that much error on the measuring of the distance between the stars.
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
Robert Bauval Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > What are you criteria in expecting 5%....
>
> The 'error' as you call is not big at all, when on
> considers the asterism that appears about 15 mm to
> the naked eye measured at arms length.
>
> 10 % in spearation is 1.5 mm. and 32 % in
> deviation is about 1 mm.
W
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
This is the Laboratory Board NOT the " I can screw up any fact to fit my insane beliefs" board. That is found lower down the list.
Begone troll.
by
lobo-hotei
-
Laboratory
Sirfiroth Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LOL I make no assumptions regarding your
> abilities, but if you have an Egyptian unit
> fraction calculator, please tell me where I can
> obtain one? (20/27)
I'm sure there is one out there in internet land as there is just about everything else you can think of to find I just use my head.(2/
by
lobo-hotei
-
Alternative Geometry and Numerology
Well what you are saying is correct, BUT....
I believe that Mark's preceding paragraph lays out the parameters for his following paragraph which you are talking about here.
He speaks of a triangle and the slope of such triangle having a base of 200 and a height of 100 would be.....blah blah blah(didn't feel like quoting).
Though he didn't clarify a 90 degree triangle I tru
by
lobo-hotei
-
Alternative Geometry and Numerology
Sirfiroth Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The weight of any data is tinted by the belief
> system of the interpreter.
So IF this is an absolute then your belief affects the outcome to what you want as well as those you originally meant this towards which I am sure didn't include yourself.
So explain how my belief, and yours as well, affects th
by
lobo-hotei
-
Alternative Geometry and Numerology
But belief is not weighed here, only evidence. The quantifiable stuff which proves things right or wrong.
That other stuff makes mountains out of a grain of sand and cause aliens to build pyramids.
Lobo-hotei
lobo
by
lobo-hotei
-
Alternative Geometry and Numerology
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
What not enveloped by the earth has its
> fame by day and its fear by night?
Lions. Hippos. Alien fish people living 'under tha sea'.
Your theory is only relative to one of the above.
Care to guess which one.
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> These are the words of the builders. It is they
> who left words that suggest that it was CO2 that
> built the pyramids. It is they who left a corpus
> that consistently says the same thing. This fit’s
> the actual physical evidence where there is no
> evidence that ramps were used to lift sto
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Warwick L Nixon Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > But he isn't making a statement of fact, he
> is
> > summing up all that is known about the
> possibility
> > of ramps. As such his assessment is
> extremely
> > accurate.
by
lobo-hotei
-
Alternative Geometry and Numerology
You are soooo lucky this isn't Survivor Island or you would have been voted off the island by the third day posting here.
Read the top and respect it. Show real world evidence and stop with the blind faith belief fantasies.
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
You haven't shown us one geyser anywhere. I don't care for your blind faith belief I only want coordinates and/or picture of the geyser in question you fantasize about around here.
Put up or shut up.
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
Using Cladking's logic and debate styles I can use Aesop's fables to prove Dr. Doolittle's theory about animals being psychic and relating to him the factual history of Noah's Ark and make it unable to be proven false by anyone else.
Regards,
Lobo-hotei
lobo
by
lobo-hotei
-
Ancient Egypt
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And you're still assuming 12 meter vertical walls
> are insignificant and that a 30 degree slope is
> navigatable.
Your always assuming you know what you are talking about.
read it again. close to bottom of article
QuoteMeanwhile, Davis's crew had constructed a scaled-down replica of the s
by
lobo-hotei
-
Alternative Geometry and Numerology
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Khazar-khum Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > By definition it is.
>
> You have to be careful with definitions or things
> get far too tricky to even communicate. For the
> purposes of this discussion I believe a ramp would
> be defined
by
lobo-hotei
-
Alternative Geometry and Numerology