May 19, 2024, 9:35 am UTC |
In: The Hall of Maat > Ancient History - Ancient History and Archaeology > Search - Ancient History and Archaeology |
Goto:  Forum List • Create A New Profile • Log In |
Hi Paul. The first image looks like a hand-axe, of sorts. Would you happen to have a friend up in the area who might know if soil analyses have been conducted? Thanks, Charlieby Charlie Hatchett - Ancient History
Here's a link with a few images and a video link:by Charlie Hatchett - Ancient History
Paul: >What you seem to be overlooking is that all dating >techniques have limitations. >___________________________________________________________ >Charlie: >Such as C14 reliably dating anything older than 50k? Why >has nothing at Hueyatlaco produced, even 1, valid C14 >date? Instead you try to project dates from another site, >over 5 km away, where oby Charlie Hatchett - Ancient History
It's unfortunate that not all of thinks are working yet. _______________________________________________________ Steve Lemaster has been very generous with his time, and has done an excellent job. He's promised to have the rest of the material uploaded shortly. Alot of interesting information, that's not, otherwise, easy to come across online. Here's a direct link toby Charlie Hatchett - Ancient History
I think this a great idea: A question forum hosted by someone who was actually there for the original and subsequent research projects. Here's the link: Peaceby Charlie Hatchett - Ancient History
Paul: What you seem to be overlooking is that all dating techniques have limitations. _____________________________________________________________________________ Charlie: Such as C14 reliably dating anything older than 50k? Why has nothing at Hueyatlaco produced, even 1, valid C14 date? Instead you try to project dates from another site, over 5 km away, where only one tool was foundby Charlie Hatchett - Ancient History
Hatchett wrote: "So my question to you, Paul, is do we reject all the long range dating methods that have been used to develop the modern Theory of Evolution, and the “Out of Africa” theory? We can’t say a method or methods are valid and reliable in one case, and then reject them when they’re inconvenient." No, this is not what am I doing. If you look at my post, you will seby Charlie Hatchett - Ancient History
Hatchett quoted Doug: "How old is the Xalnene Ash? I gather OSL dates suggest 38 to 43 thousand years. A problem, eh?" Hatchett replied: "Talk to Paul Renne, at Berkeley...he got reverse polarity (greater than 750,000), and actually publicized the date of 1.3 MYA:" Paul replied: ”Well, if you would read Gonzales et al. (2006), you will find that itby Charlie Hatchett - Ancient History
Quote How old is the Xalnene Ash? I gather OSL dates suggest 38 to 43 thousand years. A problem, eh? Schwenninger, J-L., Gonzalez S., Huddart, D., Bennett, M., and A. Gonzalez-Huesca, in press, The OSL dating of the Xalnene ash: A reply to comments by G. Duller on ''Human footprints in Central Mexico older than 40,000 years''. Quaternary Science Reviews. QuoteSo youby Charlie Hatchett - Ancient History
Quote How old is the Xalnene Ash? I gather OSL dates suggest 38 to 43 thousand years. A problem, eh? Doug Talk to Paul Renne, at Berkeley...he got reverse polarity (greater than 750,000), and actually publicized the date of 1.3 MYA: Quote LONDON Nov 30, 2005 (AP)— Footprints discovered in Mexico are either more than 1 million years older than other evidence of humans in the Western Hemby Charlie Hatchett - Ancient History