I am wondering why these numbers have never been analyzed before. Is it as is stated in the video "Is Egyptology a Pseudoscience ?" Is all archaeology a pseudoscience. I read some of the defense in support of Egyptologists but not one person could offer any concrete evidence to dispute the fact that no one has ever moved stones this large in the present era although the monstrous stone in Russia is a good defense. Regardless the point I am making is why are the numbers ignored. Oh they do due diligence in taking the numbers but then never, I mean never try to analyze those numbers to see why they were used. The Temple of Jupiter and The Temple of Bacchus are two great examples. There is another temple there however and that is next on the agenda. Here is what it looked like.





And sadly what it look like now.



And what I could find so far on the measurements,



As always I like to start with the pillars as they usually, or at least have been, yielding some important data. If you have read the thread then you know the main theme throughout is Phi. Can this temple show us Phi ? Well I just started and again could not believe what the numbers showed. However this time it is tempered with the fact that it seems that, like in Ancient Egypt, the modern inch seems to fit in where most would say it shouldn't. However I will just post what i have found.

The columns are 65 centimeters from the wall and each column i s8 meters high and 3 meters in diameter. On the surface not much there but wait.

8 meters is 314.96 inches and Pi x 100 is 314.16 so could the column have been 314.16 inches and actually be 7.98 meters ?

The diameter is also very interesting and it states that it is 3 meters. Again not much there on the surface but 3 meters is 118.11 inches and interestingly, and tying in with all the other measurements we have found for the other two temples we find that 1 / Phi or .618033988 x 1000 and then minus 500 gives us 118.034. So could the diameter be 118.034 inches or 2.998 meters ? Again and again I keep trying to state that The Ancients would never, never have built these amazing structures if they were not super important to them and tied in to their beliefs.

Why oh why are the numbers continually ignored ? My analysis at Baalbek may be flawed, might even be completely wrong BUT AT LEAST I TRIED TO FIND AN ANSWER FOR BUILDING THIS MASSIVE TEMPLE.. What have archaeologists done in this regards to the numbers ?

.All Things Are Number ... Pythagoras

.

"There is nothing as impenetrable as a closed mind"
and ..." if everything is a coincidence what is the point of studying or measuring or analyzing anything ?" db