Dear Alex,

Great to hear from you again.

I've had a lot of trouble recently, medical problems as well as computer problems. (The wretched Bill Gates has been playing about again - where are we now? win11 or win12? win 7 was very stable but now I am required to pay out for new software.) Also the world has gone mad - the world seems ruled by the smartphone and endless propaganda. This will be a seminal year for everybody on earth.

You were very complimentary about my website but I was a bit unclear about your page numbering suggestion.
As you've probably noticed I've put my foot in it again with a new thread about the Bent pyramid and Giza. But it seems we are still hampered by the lack of any reliable modern survey of the upper part of the Bent, nor of the internal arrangements (see Hamilton's comments) so no definitive statement can yet be made about things like slope angles or the dimensions of the pyramid. I liked Dorner's comment that the angles of the upper Bent, the Bent, and the Red, were probably all intended at 45 degrees.

Pasquale's matching of the Bent profile with the Giza plan is impressive, if not attractive. Anyway what do think?

Robin