cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Warwick L Nixon Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > "Certainly I can be wrong but it is very
> curious
> > that the literal meaning of the writing
> dovetails
> > with my theory"
> >
> > The fact that YOUR literal interpretation gels
> > with Your theory isn't curious at all.
> >
> > It's a ridiculous assertion to make
>
> At the risk of talking about two different
> thing...
>
> Of course my literal interpretation dovetails with
> my theory. This is the very nature of the way I
> developed the theory; it is the nature of all
> circular reasoning. If I had started with the
> assumption they were tombs I'd never even have
> seen the places where they literally say the
> pyramid is not a tomb and the king's tomb is in
> the sky.
>
> What I meant was ONLY my theory is supported by a
> literal interpretation of the writing. Certainly
> sentences like "He is the Pyramid." or "he is the
> star" are not supportive of the pyramid being a
> tomb. That it isn't excluded as a possibility is
> irrelevant. I'm suggesting the meaning of the PT
> is literal. This is difficult to see because so
> many lines are fantastic taken literally but they
> all can be taken literally. Other theories are
> not supported by these countless hundreds of
> literal "statements".
>
> I apologize in advance if I mistook your meaning.
You have based your interpretations on your assumptions re Pyramid Construction.
Period
the tail does not wag the dog
Warwick
" I have always found that the main obstacle to free
association on these boards is the broad
misconception that what we do not know is more
significant than what we do know."
Warwick L Nixon, March 8, 2019