cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hans_lune Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> > No it isn't - you've been asked for 10+ years
> to
> > show evidence you have none.
>
> All I do is cite evidence. Every single post is
> citation of evidence and you ignore it or gainsay
> it on the rare occasion you can see it at all.

Nope you don't. As someone smart said a few months ago when you are unfortunately pass away your idea dies as you've left nothing to base it on. No data, no research - its all in your opinions.



You wouldn't
> even grant that "shu" almost always appeared in
> sentences where upward movement was stated or
> implied.

Almost? You stated several hundred times it would 100% it wasn't. That is the key cornerstone of your idea that 100% of the words have one meaning.

The actual score was: 29 nope (no agreement), 6 maybe and 5 yes, 40 shu's replaced by 'upwards' so a range of correctness from 12.5 to 27.5% depending on where ones goes with the five maybes. That isn't "almost always"...LOL

So, Cladkingism has been falsified (again) your ideas failed over 15 years ago and you seem to think if you just pretend it didn't happen no one would notice.....

Other repeated nonsense deleted

Here is 666 translate it for us with explanation and cites to why you did so.

[i.imgur.com]

If you like we can create a new thread where you can translated the entire PT for us day after day.