Honestly, in listening to her talk and catching many things that are flatly incorrect, I'd say that it was one of those connections made from groups of false facts.

In logical terms, you can make a "true" by combining false facts; i.e., "if Nut is Cygnus and Horus is a Ophiuchus, then Osiris is actually the Pleaides." She reveals the foundation with her statement "The only thing that made sense to me..."

That's a big red flag. It's like me saying that "computers just couldn't have developed from the old Commodore to today's laptops in a mere 40 years. The only thing that makes sense to me is that Hewlett Packard is pulling these machines out of a wormhole to the future." An individual's lack of understanding is not the same as a group of experts' lack of understanding.

Her PhD is in education... sadly, I've met several with that degree who seem to feel that they learned everything with that degree and are now experts in even fairly esoteric or complicated fields (they aren't.) She's the author of a book on pyramid codes (which ignores all the other pyramids in Egypt) and is fascinated by plasma and patterns (and doesn't seem to completely understand just what plasma is.

So it's developed from bias and from poor quality research and a deep focus on the "spiritual" rather than on fact.

-- Byrd
Moderator, Hall of Ma'at