cladking Wrote:
Even those calling names have cited
> nothing that is provocative.
Given you attack Egyptologists regularly why are you saying others cannot do the same to GH?
""In the future people will say I've already shown that the stones were pulled straight up the sides of five step pyramids one step at a time but Egyptologists were too pig headed to see it.
Egyptologists are wholly wrong. All you have to do to prove me wrong is the science that should have been done long ago.
Someday "Egyptologists" will be the punchline of every joke.
While Egyptologists wholly misapprehend the writing in the PT and are WRONG ABOUT EVERYTHING""
You also lie about saying it and state things like this
"">No! Egyptologists are likely right about most
> things that occur after the great pyramid building
> age.""
Which is directly contradict by yourself by saying:
""I've said "Egyptology is wholly wrong about absolutely everything" more times than I can count but one person after another seems to be surprised I just said it. What the hell do they think I mean when I say "Egyptology is wholly wrong about absolutely everything"? They are wrong and NONE of their arguments are in any way relevant to what I am saying.""
You change your statements to fit your current 'tactic' in general and most often you attack science, academia, archaeologists and Egyptologist professionalism at all times to try and hide the failure of your ideas.
Oddly you've never written up why they are wrong - you only ever endless say that when they point out the endless errors in your claims.
Hypocrite, thy name is Cladking.