Ahatmose Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am afraid you are missing what he really is. He
> just regurgitates stuff he has heard, For his
> books he didn't even do his own research, Had
> others do it for him. That's not how one gains
> insight into anything. When I met him in 2001 he
> basically blackballed and verbally attacked me
> because I was posting here at Ma'at and felt Steve
> Nixon was the one who had all the insights. I
> doubt whether he has ever seriously studied the
> things that he spouts off about. He is a sham and
> I wrote him off quite a while ago.
>
> I think it is time you do the same.

I really don't know his work well enough to comment. But ultimately there really are no "new" ideas. They are all merely repackaged, mixed, matched, and blended in "new" ways. I know nothing he has written or said that warrants the name calling. Even those calling names have cited nothing that is provocative.

I do have some respect for your opinion but have no first hand knowledge nor much to base my own opinion of his work. While my own theory looks wholly alien to almost every observer in every field the simple fact is that there is absolutely nothing that is "new". I get called far more names than Graham Hancock.

If the doctrine and status quo are too weak to stand against the truth than that is a problem for the status quo and not for Hancock. If he isn't politically incorrect that is another problem for those who believe there is only one correct belief and reality is subservient to that belief.

____________
Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 01/10/2023 02:39PM by cladking.