cladking Wrote:

>
> So not only is he not allowed to agree with
> anything but doctrine but he can't say anything
> that has been said by racists!

He can say anything he wants but he has to has understand he will be called on it - just like you. That's normal you know? I mean you question everything anyone says to you why can't people question Hancock?

There's nothing
> new under the sun and virtually everything has
> been said before. It is nobody's responsibility
> to research what who's said what before.

Yes it is its one of the basics of Academia. The first thing you do before you open your mouth is to find out what is already known about a subject BEFORE rejecting or supporting it. You are violating both of those; you don't understand archaeology and you don't know what what Hancock has said

> Your well established MO is to try to draw me off
> topic and then complain I'm off topic.

Nope my well established MO is to point out you aren't telling the truth, are avoiding evidence like the Shu Experiment and to point out that your ideas are falsified
>
> I'd love to talk about any of it but you will be
> first to cry it is off topic. Why do you ignore
> the evidence when it is relevant?

No idea what you are talking about - oh wait you're running from the Lord Sabu example. Typical Cladking scream and run from actual evidence. Okay I will repeat the questions and examples for that in the next message (limited time at the moment). At the moment you concede you are wrong about evidence and opinion as shown in Lord Sabu.
>
> No. I am defending his right to have an opinion
> and to write about the subject without personal
> attacks. I don't know much about his contentions
> but appreciate his insights.

Sure he was Netflix, publishes his books, gives talks and has a website - so his right to voice his opinion is not being infringed - He however doesn't have a right to expect not to questioned on his opinions. I would note you launch personal attacks on Egyptologist all the time. Why aren't you concerned about that?
>
I will repeat all the Sabu arguments a bit later. Feel free to run away - oh and will also continue to ask you about your refusal to address the Shu Experiments.

You (as the cat) in scientific debate: [twitter.com]



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/10/2023 11:21AM by Hans_lune.