Hans_lune Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> It an observation that in the past he spouted and
> repeated previous claims by racists which is why
> he switch from his lost civilization being white
> folks to Native Americans in his latest attempt to
> gain money from the gullible.

So not only is he not allowed to agree with anything but doctrine but he can't say anything that has been said by racists! There's nothing new under the sun and virtually everything has been said before. It is nobody's responsibility to research what who's said what before.

> Nope you are being disingenuous to try and cover
> your never providing any evidence to support you
> claims.Then link to it and make me a liar?

Your well established MO is to try to draw me off topic and then complain I'm off topic.

I'd love to talk about any of it but you will be first to cry it is off topic. Why do you ignore the evidence when it is relevant?

> But you are trying to defend his material without
> even know what it is?

No. I am defending his right to have an opinion and to write about the subject without personal attacks. I don't know much about his contentions but appreciate his insights.

My beliefs aren't important but I do believe his detractors might have more effect by engaging the argument.

> No you don't you only like stuff that agrees with
> your bias - everything else is simply ignored -
> ...

Most scientific theories capable of prediction are simple and elegant. This isn't about me, it is about science and reality. Perhaps you should read some of the great scientists since many have spoken on this exact subject as well as the nature of "evidence" and "paradigms". Try Kuhn or Burtt. "Principia" is a very fine work. Feynman and Einstein have a great deal to say on the nature of science and how it works. "Doctrine" has no meaning at all in real science.

I will not return to this subthread unless it returns to the subject.

____________
Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.