cladking Wrote:
> Stating someone is a racist ands is supplying
> fodder for nazis is a personal attack and it is
> unbecoming for science.
It an observation that in the past he spouted and repeated previous claims by racists which is why he switch from his lost civilization being white folks to Native Americans in his latest attempt to gain money from the gullible.
>
> > Nope you have not - link to your research and
> data
> > that supports this? You have NEVER put this
> claim
> > into a coherent argument - its just endless
> > repeats of the same claims without evidence.
> You
> > say you have it. Okay post the link.
>
> I have stated it numerous times and each time you
> ignore it in its entirety and its every part.
Nope you are being disingenuous to try and cover your never providing any evidence to support you claims.Then link to it and make me a liar? Lets see this webpage, book, pdf, etc., where you make your case? What you can't? Yeah we know.....
>
> Again, evidence has meaning only in terms of the
> paradigm. When anyone cites evidence for a
> different interpretation it is not seen except in
> light of the existing paradigm or it is dismissed
> as irrelevant. Physical evidence and lack of it
> are never irrelevant.
Mental confusion....
Still don't understand evidence huh? Or are you just doing your pretending act now?
Example: You claim the AE had no religion - you've never present a coherent document to support this with evidence - your stating the claim is an opinion not evidence...
Evidence to support the theory that the AE had a religion, the existence of temples, priesthood, the Abusir document and Lord Sabu's tomb:
[
html.scirp.org]. Now in this image are shown the items found in Sabu's tomb. toilet articles, food, storage jars , an ox, flint tools, various containers that may have contained all manner of things. So, why does you super logical non-religious folks think he is going to an afterlife and needs food, luxuries and tools for a journey? He's dead. The image is evidence and my comment is based on that evidence - it isn't just an opinion. The theory we can draw from this is that AE believed in an afterlife and providing materials to the dead so they could journey to said after life is evidence of such.
Abusire papyri: they give detailed information about the running of a royal mortuary temple and include duty rosters for priests, inventories of temple equipment, and lists of daily offerings to the two solar temples at Abu Gorab, north of Abusir. Why are your super logical non-religious folks giving daily offering to a solar god? Again evidence not opinion you can read the papyri yourself.
> This is not strictly true. The new explanation
> merely needs to be better supported than the old
> one.
Yes and based on EVIDENCE not opinion
> > Well may I recommend you go read his material
> > before you start telling us how right he
> > is..................sheesh.
>
> You should know by now I don't agree with anyone
> about anything.
But you are trying to defend his material without even know what it is? Does the word 'incapable' mean anything to you?
Yes you are an extreme contrarian. Which isn't a point in your favor because you disagree just to disagree and pay no attention to the evidence. Which means you have no credibility. Since all you spout is biased opinions based on your beliefs and not on the evidence
So I don't
> normally read Hancock or any Egyptologist other
> than to skim the work for facts and evidence.
Yes we are well aware you don't have a body of knowledge in what you pretend to understand. Other than cherry picking and making stuff up you have no actual expertise in anything.
> Opinion, even my opinion, has no value.
Yet that is all you ever express....
I don't care about opinion.
> Science doesn't care about opinion. Reality
> itself is unswayed by any opinion whatsoever.
Yet again OPINION is all your offer up.
>
> I like simplicity and elegance in trying to
> conceptualize the infinitely complex nature of
> reality. I like theories that explain a lot.
> Most people who don't agree with doctrine have the
> same oir similar motivation.
No you don't you only like stuff that agrees with your bias - everything else is simply ignored - just like you try and ignore the Shu experiment. However, it's still there and we use that to frame your trying to forget it exists as clear evidence of your incompetence and unreliability to make statements about anything.
Because of this all your ideas were/are dismissed as biased, un-evidenced opinion - and they continue to be.