Hans_lune Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> C-14 is reliable as is stratigraphy, fluorine
> dating, thermoluminescence,

Ipso facto, the methods by which the dating of the GP has been established are not only reliable, but agree with each other.

Clearly, I have a doubt about such a conclusion.

Thus, somewhere along the line, if, as I contend, the GP was built before 10,000BC, the dating went awry.

Maybe you should read my 3 warnings again?


> however what is most
> interesting is that - in your theory - everyone
> dies - but then remarkably the exactly same
> cultures continues unabated - how does that work
> exactly?

Not 'everyone dies' [qua extinction vs mortality] - or we wouldn't be here.

I never claimed that 'exactly the same cultures continue unabated'.

For example, it would be practically impossible for a Nile valley culture to resume after cataclysmic inundation (sea level rising 120-180m above normal). Conversely, it may be possible (given sufficient warning) for a people to evacuate/migrate to a nearby mountainous region, out of reach of a mega-tsunami, but their culture would no doubt be considerably affected, even if they could partially preserve some aspects such as language.


> Show evidence from these two cultures of
> there total destruction and immediate
> reconstruction with the exactly the same tools and
> habitations?

Perhaps you can point out where I said this happened?


> Please link to archaeological studies showing this
> in the Nile valley for these two cultures.

I doubt there are any.


> As a
> matter of fact explain why there is no such
> destruction level anywhere in the world

I'm not entirely sure what you mean by this?

What is a 'destruction level'?

Every stratum in sedimentary rock corresponds to a single cataclysm. Each discontinuity layer corresponds to a dozen millennia of vegetation and/or weathering. All strata throughout the world are contemporaneous, i.e. a sequence of strata in one continent can be matched with the same sequence on another continent.

Each stratum is the deposition of metres of rubble/diluvium by a corresponding global cataclysm (eventually highly compacted).

It's not a pretty sight once you understand it, but the destruction is globally extensive, even if, thankfully, not exhaustive. :-/


> - and if
> everyone died who then rebuilt the world?

Again, we are here, QED not 'everyone died'.

Even so, it is an ELE. Consequently, the GP is there to warn us - just in case without such warning 'everyone dies' next time.

Mostly it is to enable us to prepare, to ensure the preservation of mankind's technological advancement such that eventually, cyclic cataclysm can be withstood like a city withstands a seasonal tornado, and mankind can avoid being continually sent back to the stone age every dozen millennia.


> The purpose doesn't make much sense, I believe the
> word is 'contrived'.

Yes, the engineers of the GP contrived its design precisely to provide proof to us of cyclic cataclysm.


> Why not images of what they
> suspect would happen?

I expect they considered that proof was sufficient, that images could be left to the imagination.


> Why does the C-14 dating of
> the pyramids not show the date you assign to it?

That is one of those dangerous questions that begin to arise...


> What is Khafre's tomb for then? What about his
> coffer?

I've started the ball rolling with the Great Pyramid. There must be millions of perspicacious minds able to take my lead and apply themselves to solving the mysteries of other pyramids.