Pistol Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> As you mentioned, it will be interesting to learn
> the results of Scan 2.0, and the opinions of
> Egyptologists. Publishing results of Scan 1.0
> without consulting the council first was a
> mistake, however the word salads offered by Lehner
> and Hawass to discredit Scan 1.0 (Swiss cheese and
> normal construction voids) aren't exactly proven
> either and were not convincing. It remains to be
> seen if they will ever get the money and approval
> for Scan 2.0, they should be required to provide a
> proof of concept before they interrupt one of
> Egypts main sources of tourism. Besides all they
> have done thus far is to create further
> speculation without anyway of being able to prove
> anything... unless they plan on drilling through
> the side of the pyramid... then you could say like
> "Swiss Cheese"

I don't think we should lose sight of the fact that most of the results from Scans 1.0 have not even been released yet. Not even Egyptologists have been allowed to see the huge amount of infrared data or the data from the boroscope that was apparently inserted into the thermal anomaly without even being announced. This data besides being enormous in scope has already disproven some construction techniques such as internal ramps.

Nobody is going to solve how these were built until there is data and we're not going to understand the builders before we understand what they did. Working backward from understanding the builders has not worked as proven by the inability of Egyptology to make prediction or explain facts in evidence.

____________
Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/01/2022 03:03PM by cladking.