Kanga Wrote -
>Gantenbrink only measured
> the slopes of the shafts near the exit points. He
> did not survey the elevations of these points. The
> so-called "Gantenbrink's surveyed shafts" were
> reconstructions based on his theoretical model for
> the shafts based on whole palm sekeds.
I don't know what Gantenbrink actually measured but his theoretical model does explain the geometry of the shafts in terms of the pyramid form itself, which is rather compelling. If Petrie's figures are preferred they make no geometrical sense to me - unless say certain astronomical considerations are invoked. But why go over again all the speculations presented in previous threads? We just have to wait until our betters decide to address the contradiction seriously.