Quote

Easily you guys don't agree. If you all agreed you might have something - how many folks are there currently posting on the internet that they have found 'math' in the pyramid and how many of them found exactly what you found? ( or is the stuff you took up from an earlier numerology person, sorry I've forgotten). How many different methods of measurement have been brought forth 'as what they used', or 'they did this encode this'?

I totally agree. The internet is full of erroneous web pages and faulty data that just keeps getting repeated and repeated, The Hancock video is a great example. I am surprised at the big names in the alternative field who back people who present pathetically wrong data and calculations. For heavens sake the OCT is still going strong. I just watched a Carl Munck video ( [youtu.be]) [16.33 minutes long] where he details a great long theory on grid lines and Stonehenge and the co-ordinates he uses for Stonehenge ... ARE WRONG. That is why I have continually said over and over again that we need qualified people in various fields to go over the data and make intelligent findings. Your camp is the worst offender. You deliberately let the theories flow, knowing full well that the data is wrong but never bother to try to see what the data might show. I have painstakingly studied the math at Giza and in Egypt for over 20 years. I have made millions and millions of calculations and now when I see a new theory emerge I know it is nonsense because I know that the math is wrong.

Sadly like the alleged "Old Boys Club" in Egyptology and Archaeology the alternative field is just as bad or worse.

It will remain like this until such time as serious research is done on these various theories and the ones using bad data need to be scrapped.

But I agree like The Christians "we" quarrel too much, the fringe will never unite. Too many people trying to make a fast buck.

The data I present is sound, correct and has been checked a hundred times over. No one has ever found fault with my math, just with my interpretation of this math but other than ... "just a co-incidence" no one has offered another explanation.

What we need is someone to take a look at my data and see if there is a way an ancient culture could have figured out the ratio of the planets from watching the heavens and knowing the the time of rotation of said planets..They need not have gone to the stars or come from them but maybe they found something that we have forgotten. Sadly since no one in the foreseeable future is planning on doing this I fear I will not see it in my lifetime.

And in regards to Velikovski I am sure you know I meant the criticism he received from people who had not even read the book.

db

"There is nothing as impenetrable as a closed mind"
and ..." if everything is a coincidence what is the point of studying or measuring or analyzing anything ?" db