cladking Wrote:
> You just ASSUMED they are incantation in response
> to the statement that it's impossible to prove
> anything is incantation as a black box problem.
You are assuming against the evidence that they are not.
>
> It follows you don't know any of this is
> incantation. You are trapped in a world view
> where superstition makes people strong and
> capable.
Yawn. No Cladking it makes them motivated. Just like in the current world in which you live. Your pretending to not understand that is amusing.
Let me show you another one of your false assumptions: You believed that by ignoring my previous questions I wouldn't repeat them
You were wrong - again.
Here they are again - they will be repeated until answered
You said:
> We've had infrared technology for more than a
> century and it has been commercially available for
> 80 years but there has never been published an
> infrared study of any great pyramid.
Oh - well shows us the first use of it on a building.....and the results from that test.
You said:
> I've listed the other science that has never been
> done and published numerous times.
Except you refuse to link to where you've done that so unfortunately we'll consider that another claim that has no basis.
> When anomalies are disclosed these must be
> studied. It never occurred to me during all those
> years of calling for science that the testing
> would outperform my wildest dreams but then they'd
> just drop it and never publish the results.
Oh are they finished? Please explain when they finished and who did it? If they didn't finish why would they publish?
> In this case "anomaly" can be defined
> as any concrete data that doesn't conform to
> Egyptological beliefs.
Such as? Shows us please some of this concrete data - not your opinion a PRP with link.
and a reminder:
Previous questions you refused to answer
You made the following claim:
>>but instead no one is
>>interested and the lead investigator won't allow
>>data published unless they agree with current
>>theory.
I asked you:
>REALLY is this your oft stated claim that Hawass said something like that? Care to link to it?
You refusal to provide the link means your claim is fal