cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> We've had infrared technology for more than a
> century and it has been commercially available for
> 80 years but there has never been published an
> infrared study of any great pyramid.
Oh - well shows us the first use of it on a building.....and the results from that test.
> I've listed the other science that has never been
> done and published numerous times.
Except you refuse to link to where you've done that so unfortunately we'll consider that another claim that has no basis.
>
> When anomalies are disclosed these must be
> studied. It never occurred to me during all those
> years of calling for science that the testing
> would outperform my wildest dreams but then they'd
> just drop it and never publish the results.
Oh are they finished? Please explain when they finished and who did it? If they didn't finish why would they publish?
> In this case "anomaly" can be defined
> as any concrete data that doesn't conform to
> Egyptological beliefs.
Such as? Shows us please some of this concrete data - not your opinion a PRP with link.
> Currently the beliefs
> are "obviously" flawed because they stand on
> illogical and unevidenced assumptions.
In your illogical and un-evidenced opinion.
> It's very difficult to
> prove that the ancient incantation work, don't
> work, or are really incantation at all.
In the modern world we have 100% failure rate for incantations working.....however there are thousands of years of belief by humans that they DO work.
---------------------------------------------
Previous questions you refused to answer
You made the following claim:
>>but instead no one is
>>interested and the lead investigator won't allow
>>data published unless they agree with current
>>theory.
I asked you:
>REALLY is this your oft stated claim that Hawass said something like that? Care to link to it?
You refusal to provide the link means your claim is falsified...again.