cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Don Barone Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > " ... They have conclusively shown there were
> no
> > internal ramps ... "
> >
> > Hmmm .... Now how the devil could they prove
> > anything conclusively in regards to the
> pyramid
> > without dismantling it ?
> >
> > Jean Pierre might beg to differ ...
>
> I hope you don't feel like I'm sniping at you. I
> have a great deal of respect for your work and
> believe at least some will stand the test of time.
>
>
> No sloped lines appear on the thermal scans.

Nor would they - fake argument one

No
> voids show up in the right places in the muon scan
> to support his specific theory.

Fake argument two


The specific
> theory is disproven and the entire concept becomes
> unworkable in light of this new evidence.


Fake argument three - please link to this mythical debunkment of ramps - after many years all you do is run when asked about it.....run Cladking run...lol


This
> isn't to say that it's impossible for there to
> have been internal ramps just that they have been
> positively shown to be unevidenced.

Why a real statement! The same can be said for canals and geysers, and stone statue inside too all un-evidenced

In order for
> such ramps to exist they have to be more than ~40'
> inside the pyramid or they would have conducted
> enough heat up to the corners to be visible.

Fake argument four

> Since they aren't visible they don't exist. Ramps
> farther inside than what appears could only have
> reached about the 375'.

Fake argument five
>
> Ramps are inconsistent with the evidence that does
> exist and with the new data that show a linear
> void extending under the gables at the entrance.

Fake argument six

> It is merely incidental that a chamber just inside
> has been disproven because a chamber might exist
> even further inside making his hypothesis still
> workable.

Fake argument seven

But remember the hypothesis sprang from
> the observation there were gables so it's not
> justified; the gables are obviously for a
> different purpose than relieving weight.

Fake argument eight
>
> I hate to see Houdin shown to be wrong as much as
> anyone but the fact is there is no chamber and no
> internal ramps.

Fake conclusion based on eight fake arguments

The niches on the NE corner are
> most likely part of a general system of weight
> relief in this region and have nothing to do with
> ramps internal or otherwise.

Un-evidenced and illogical made up reason tending towards another fake argument