Quote

If I'm going to talk about Achilles' Shield Decoded by Henk van Oosten, the first thing I'll say is: the theory is wrong. The second is: Van Oosten's vision is original and interdisciplinary. The third is: he errs in commission. All of his reasoning errors are also present in peer-reviewed articles. Don't get me wrong: I'm not saying academic science is as bad as pseudoscience. I'm just saying that academic archeology isn't perfect.